When choosing a place for living, which factor is the most important one for you? A. Living in an area that is not expensive? B. Living close to relatives? C. Living in an area with many shops and restaurants.
No one can deny the indisputable effects of place of residence on peoples' morale. There are a ton of debates as to where is the best place to settle in during our lifetime. Regarding this controversial issue, I thoroughly prefer to live in a neighborhood which enjoys many shops and restaurants. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will develop in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, a place full of shopping malls provides more convenience for its dwellers. It is crystal clear that its inhabitants are not obliged to drive their cars far distances and be stuck in traffic for hours to access the places they tend to go. On the other hand, people living in areas full of shops can easily walk to the nearest shopping mall to buy their needs. I have to admit that my personal experience has profoundly influenced my opinion on this matter. I live in a district that is endowed with various stores. Mostly, I do not bother myself going out of the neighborhood and mainly purvey my needs from the next-door stores. Had my area not had vast choices of stores, I would be compelled to travel far distances to supply the products I need every day.
Secondly, places full of stores and restaurants would be more entertaining. It is worth mentioning that life is too hectic these days, that it does not let us allocate a significant time for our pastime. Accordingly, we mainly hope to spend some time on our hobbies or amusement, without surmounting a lot of time and energy. Thus, recreational sites next to our houses would pave the way to enjoy life while wasting less time. Drawing from my own experience, My sister lives in a location without any noticeable stores. Whenever I go to her house, I get bored because there is no recreational place to wander around or gather with friends and communicate.
Consequently, in light of the reasons mentioned I firmly believe that places near malls would be more beneficial. That is because not only do they provide more convenience, but also they are more entertaining for their residents.
- Question Professor Today we re going to discuss whether the government should tax unhealthy products such as sugary drinks and junk food On one hand taxing these products could discourage people from consuming them and reduce health problems On the other 70
- The balance between human needs and environmental preservation is a central topic in the contemporary world As we expand our cities and industries we must also consider the effects on our natural habitats With that in mind here is the question for the dis 70
- Many companies sell products or services but at the same time cause environmental damage Someone said it can be stop by ask them to pay penalty such as a higher tax when they cause the environmental damage Others said there are better ways to stop them fr 76
- Many companies sell products or services but at the same time cause environmental damage Someone said it can be stop by ask them to pay penalty such as a higher tax when they cause the environmental damage Others said there are better ways to stop them fr 76
- The golden frog is a small bright yellow amphibian that lives in and around mountain streams in Panama The species is severely endangered because of a fungus that infects the frog through its skin and inhibits the frog s critical life functions such as br 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as to, i feel, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74789915966 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79109128945 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585434173669 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1275465838 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.2105263158 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73684210526 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208747046089 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616637170695 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05954790358 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118960797412 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586921617867 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.