When people travel, they visit the museums. Why do you think they visit the museums?
Travelling is the most enjoyable activity for the humanity. While travelling people learn too much things, and meet with new people. With travelling we discover new places. Some people visit museums when they travel to different places. I believe they visit museums for two reasons to learn the historical background of the places and the culture, that I will explain in the following essay.
The first reason need to be mention is to learn historical background. When you visit the local museum while you are travelling, you can learn the important historical details, and events about the city. For example, last summer I visited a really small village which is called Moena in Italy. This city is not well-known, but it was so impressive. To learn more about the city I visited the museum. Add to that, I learned plenty of things about the village, such as the founder I was so surprised because the founder was Turkish, and even learned about their architectural structure. Thus, in my view people visit the museums while travelling to learn about the historical background.
The second reason to be point out is people additionally want to learn the culture. Since we are curious, we have a desire to understand the culture, in order to contact with the people. When we travel to another places we meet with different people from another cultures, and countries. To contact with the domestic people we need to understand them, and the best way is learning culture. For example, emergently, one behavior is convenient to you, however it can be inconvenient to other people. Hence, I think people visit museums while travelling, since they want to learn their culture.
Overall, in my view people visit the museums during their trip for two reasons, they want to learn the historical background, and learn the culture.
- Do you agree or disagree? A person should never make an important decision alone. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- the positive and negative impacts of the eco torism? 78
- Do you agree or disagree?People learn things better from at their own level, such as co-workers, students, than from those at higher level, such as teachers, and supervisiors. 70
- Do you agree or disagree?People today spend to much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather then they should do. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...nity. While travelling people learn too much things, and meet with new people. With ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stand them, and the best way is learning culture. For example, emergently, one be...
^^
Line 6, column 383, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to culture'
Suggestion: to culture
...and them, and the best way is learning culture. For example, emergently, one behavior ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, really, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, i think, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99673202614 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62967949261 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460784313725 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2552771922 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4736842105 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1052631579 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317693075701 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12120710049 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127514555627 0.0737576698707 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225153248899 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605181400334 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.