When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
There might be some people who believe that when students are asked to work alone on projects they can learn more effectively than when they work together. However, I personally disagree with the above idea for the two subsequent reasons. First, working together helps to save the time for completing of an assignment. Second, working together can motivate each other.
First of all, working together makes it possible to divide amount of an assignment for each student. Less amounts of assignment helps students to study more closely on their own part and they can exchange what they learn for the others of their group. According to a recent survey done by The Institute of SE, 80% of the students said that studying together is more efficient than studying alone. They explained that focusing on the smaller range enhances their concentration in the limited time. This clearly shows that working together is a good way to save time when students learn something by their assignment.
Second, working together is helpful to motivates each other in the same group. In general, people feel tired and bored when they are doing an assignment. Having a person who solves the same problem is very helpful. Let me bring up my personal story as an example. When I was a senior of university, I was in trouble because I was late to submit a paper for my graduation. It was not only my trouble but also my friend JM’s. Luckily our major was same: Philosophy. We decided to work together by studying the same thinker, Kant. We pushed each other so we finished. If I had tried to work alone, I wouldn’t have done my paper.
In conclusion, working in group makes save the time and more concentration. In this regard, working in group for students has more effect on learning than working by themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...king together can motivate each other. First of all, working together makes it ...
^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun amounts is countable.
Suggestion: Fewer
...ount of an assignment for each student. Less amounts of assignment helps students to...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s learn something by their assignment. Second, working together is helpful to m...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, I wouldn't have done my paper. In conclusion, working in group makes sa...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'in conclusion', 'in general', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.178977272727 0.229887763892 78% => OK
Verbs: 0.198863636364 0.158761421928 125% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0767045454545 0.0866891130778 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0710227272727 0.046263068375 154% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0823863636364 0.0685040099705 120% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119318181818 0.118717715034 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0596590909091 0.0351676179071 170% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.62063571098 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0284090909091 0.0309702414327 92% => OK
Particles: 0.00284090909091 0.00188951952338 150% => OK
Determiners: 0.0795454545455 0.0887237588012 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0113636363636 0.0209618222197 54% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0227272727273 0.0139019557991 163% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1813.0 2387.08602151 76% => OK
No of words: 310.0 408.028673835 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84838709677 5.86048508987 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.48200974243 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.332258064516 0.338922669872 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.261290322581 0.251872472559 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183870967742 0.174417080927 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0838709677419 0.112833075102 74% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62063571098 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535483870968 0.524397521467 102% => OK
Word variations: 55.5071346232 59.2087087015 94% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.5 20.5533526081 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8905761579 48.84282405 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.65 120.699889404 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.5533526081 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.644075263715 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 41.6290322581 45.7405998639 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.01612903226 1.45489161554 70% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340611390331 0.300154397459 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.117247297698 0.103427244359 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.107068022311 0.0752933317313 142% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.443525350609 0.497263757937 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.161046514686 0.151897553556 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10514872554 0.114077575197 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125579404167 0.0781384742642 161% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.268070427064 0.336927656856 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.127980883701 0.067059652881 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229110602408 0.210909579961 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12840768622 0.0618886996521 207% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.