When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
As always was said, if people gather together and decide to do work with each other, it follows the best results at the end. every society prevents people to do work individually and encourages them to be as a group. school is an example of a society which gather children and teenagers for educational purposes. In this way, teacher may assign different projects to the students and asks them to do that in a group of friends. I, for two reasons, think students should do these types of assignments together as an effective tool.
First of all, it can be argued that every student has his attitude toward the problems. based on this fact, when a group of students gather and think about different solutions of a project, they prepare more solutions instead of being individually because when one has to think about all aspect, he has to spend much time while he may find few solutions and get confused. For example, when I was at high school, a teacher gave us a project and asked us to create six-members groups. His belief toward this decision was avoiding us to be hermit persons because he said projects are challengeable and no one can solve them by his own while deadline don't let him.
Furthermore, when some students work together as a member of a group, they may make a circle of friends with each other which bonding them for the future cooperations. As a fact, when people need to spend time with others to reach a goal, like doing an assignment or a project, they know themselves through it and they will be adapted to consider every personality feature of each member. when this happens, no one wants to break up these relations because they have already reached to a harmony with others. With these experiences, if a student gets into a trouble in his part of project, others help him in the best way based on experiences they had and it increase the productivity of the group besides their less spending time.
In conclusion, it can be mentioned that group projects have more preference instead of individually. students in a group have different ideas which help the group to solve problems as less time as they can. Also, this type of collaborations may influence on the future projects which persons gain great experiences in interacting with others that results are more productivity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 73
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
As always was said, if people gather together and dec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Every
...it follows the best results at the end. every society prevents people to do work indi...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: School
...y and encourages them to be as a group. school is an example of a society which gather...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Based
...t has his attitude toward the problems. based on this fact, when a group of students ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...an solve them by his own while deadline dont let him. Furthermore, when some stud...
^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ery personality feature of each member. when this happens, no one wants to break up ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 660, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...ay based on experiences they had and it increase the productivity of the group besides t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
...ore preference instead of individually. students in a group have different ideas which h...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74193548387 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67726871945 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491315136476 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.0221775282 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.4375 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1875 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327073696257 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111205184518 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583081825643 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201405849979 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298163660139 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.