When working on creative work, do you prefer to be in a team or do you prefer to work alone. which do you prefer and why?
In many companies, they choose various ways when they work on a creativity task. One company decides teamwork to pursue the original task. Other company uses opposite ways for a casual task to work alone. In my view, I prefer to decide teamwork for creative work. It will be outstanding tasks due to communication, motivation, and divided tasks in the team.
First, people definitely communicate with each other for creative work in teamwork. When people are obliged to work alone, they have to create new ideas by themselves. Thus, it is limited for them to make innovations because they are not able to acquire advice from their colleges. However, team workers give advice if they concern about how to manage the creative tasks. From this action, they can find solutions for coping with the problems. As a result, workers contribute to creative tasks for the company through communication.
Secondly, team workers keep their motivation for their creative tasks. While people notice that someone does hard work, people come up with the idea that they have to compete with them or arduously deal with their works. This thought will occur in the environment of teamwork. For example, someone extolls one worker in the team because he gets the prize of competition from the company. Then, the motivation of others focuses on how to achieve superb prize next competition. Therefore, this thought makes the company more creative.
Thirdly, the team is able to separate works between them for creativity. If the company decides to one worker to cope with a new task, he has to manage all tasks of them. However, it is so efficient for team workers to divide their tasks. For instance, workers who work in a biotechnology company create new medians in the team, they purse their works such as financial, practice, and advertisement and so on. Then, they come up with the idea that they have to allotment each task of each worker. Thus, they are able to save their time, so the task will be gradually incentive one.
To sum up, I surely believe that team workers should be judged for their creative work by the company. They are able to carry out this task through the production of communicating, motivation, and separate tasks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-20 | akimasa7887 | 60 | view |
- Some people think that some lessons for young children age 4 8 which include video games can serve as effective and interesting ways of learning while others think that these lessons are quite distracting and can be seen as a waste of time What is your op 40
- Some people prefer to take small classes in which the professor can remember every student s name Other people think it is better to take big classes Which do you prefer and why 68
- 70
- which do you think is the most important factor to improve people s work efficiencies 1 Having a work environment which is free of noise and distractions 2 Knowing that they will be rewarded 3 Doing jobs they are interested in 68
- To help the first year students adapt to new college life university has two plans One is to offer a week orientation The other is to ask to the freshman to meet with their senior year schoolmates regularly According to your opinions which plan is better 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to create new ideas by themselves. Thus, it is limited for them to make innovatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92838196286 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58032521685 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477453580902 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 577.8 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0525414703 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.32 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.08 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140367359858 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526798117125 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605877615767 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100607705399 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397808017447 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.