Which do you prefer, to buy new technological devices immediately after they become available or to wait till many people have adopted (=accepted and started to use) them?
The way to avoid mortifying failures in our choices has become the topic of great controversy in recent years. There is a considerable body of opinion that holds it betters to wait till many people have adopted new technological devices before you afford to it. This paper will elucidate the reasons why I am in favor of this opinion.
On one hand, failure avoidance and effective time management are what I consider a crucial factor. It is noteworthy that waiting till many people have adopted new products before purchasing is synonymous with receiving a review from many users who have already bought the new technological devices. Thanks to this, we are likely to obtain multifarious information from plenty of websites. Accordingly, we are capable of ensuring the authenticity and utility of the device. With this in mind, we stand a golden chance to gain more sense of reassurance. Eventually, this probably gives rise to failure avoidance. More notably, based on my experience from the PS5 sales event; because there are a large amount of people want to buy the new technological devices immediately after they become available, while we are waiting till many people have adopted, avoiding a crowd of people is inevitable. In the event of this, there is a likelihood for us to purchase new technological devices more smoothly and time-effective. On the ground of that, it is possible for us to save time and use our spare time effectively to do something else. During this process, we are prone to have a felicitous choice for time management. Under those circumstances, it makes it feasible for us to live optimistically. Given these points, waiting till many people have adopted new products greatly contributes to effective time management.
On the other hand, some people express a different view that waiting till others have adopted new products discourages them from a lot of excitements. As a consequence, it creates a huge burden on our positive feelings. Although that might be true, it is just applicable to a minority. We have already well thought about the plan. Incidentally, there is a certain purposefulness about waiting till others have adopted new products. Therefore, it is unlikely that waiting before purchasing new products prevent us from being excited in big sales event. Another point often overlooked is that even if the loss of excitement does exist, it should be considered as the chance for us to purchase new technological devices with higher accuracy and efficiency. By the same token, we have an inclination to avert the unexpected repercussions caused by mechanical trouble. By virtue of this, we are given the opportunity to observe the frugality in the expenditure of money, which creates a significant impact on the pecuniary profit. Beyond any doubt, they tend to be more motivated and inspired in daily life. This, indeed, empowers us to ameliorate the quality of works and ramp up production capacity. By and large, people should put off the idea that waiting till others have adopted new products discourages them from a lot of excitement.
In summary, failure avoidance and effective time management are the convincing reasons for my approval. It is my hope that people take this writing into great consideration to gather diverse perspectives on the issue regarding the way to avoid mortifying failures in our choices.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important investment of a company is to improve the skills of its employees 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain a small number of friends for a long time is more important to happiness than the ability to make new friends easily
- It is important for everyone to know about what happening all around the world even though the events have not affect our daily life 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement modern agriculture does damage the environment but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 71
- It is important for everyone to know about what happening all around the world even though the events have not affect our daily life 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...siderable body of opinion that holds it better to wait till many people have adopted n...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 702, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
... sales event; because there are a large amount of people want to buy the new technolog...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...the convincing reasons for my approval. it is my hope that people take this writin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, incidentally, look, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, while, in summary, by and large, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 52.1666666667 171% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2818.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 553.0 407.700716846 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09584086799 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98550004746 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49547920434 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 945.9 618.680645161 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5681395938 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1724137931 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0689655172 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13793103448 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328254972103 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777732862092 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104245742395 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182928667769 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996214685894 0.0645574589148 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.