Which do you think is more helpful to the students: internet materials or textbook materials? Why do you think so? Include details and examples to support your explanation.
During the last decades, the way of acquiring knowledge and studying has become hotly-debated among societies. Opinions are divided into whether paper-based materials are more helpful for pupils or the internet-based ones. Personally, it is my firm conviction that students can be benefited far more from online materials compared to printed materials. stating in the subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on my standpoint through the two following concrete reasons.
The first worthwhile mentioning to champion may stance is that Internet sources are dramatically convenient to access. In this connection, Students will not have to worry regarding the access of related useful sources to researches. To put it in other words, the internet made it real to reach most of the sources online even the old sources, virtuality. Being a student, my personal experience of my first science article is an apt illustration of this. Two years before now, I started a paper under the supervision of my professor. However, I provided an ample number of books and articles as my primary sources for literature review, just a few of them were accessible in printed materials Because most of them were ISI papers that did available inside the country let alone at the college. Consequently, consulting with my supervisor, I found that most of my desirable sources could be obtained, online. As a result, it can be clearly inferred that how internet-based sources are easier to access.
The second explicit point to support my outlook is that as almost all printed-based materials are available online, students would be able to save a considerable amount of time because they do not have to go to libraries, for instance, and they will have the access to all sources they need for their studies, no matter where they are. To further illustrate, back to my previous example, being available all the sources on the internet, saved me lots of time due to not having to commute to the university library every day. In fact, I stayed at the dormitory searching online, I managed to finish my first draft sooner than my roommate had to go to the library of the college to have access to his references. Had I never used the online sources, I could have not fulfilled my science paper.
To wrap up what has been discussed, I profoundly reckon the notion that internet-based materials have much more pluses rather than paper-based ones for students. This is because online sources not only do facilitate access to sources but also serve students by saving their valuable time.
- People think that increasing the use of computers and mobiles has a negative effect on young people s writing and reading skill Do you agree or disagree 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they do many different tasks during a workday than they do the same tasks all day 73
- Palm oil a liquid produced by palm trees and used for cooking and other purposes has become very popular in recent years As a result the palm oil industry has had a dramatic impact on the economies and landscapes of countries in which it operates When ask 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events that are happening around the world 76
- The ability to maintain id a friendship with a few people is more important for happiness than the ability to make new friends easily Do you agree or disagree 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Stating
...aterials compared to printed materials. stating in the subsequent paragraphs, I will el...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, look, may, regarding, second, so, while, for instance, in fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03537735849 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90120703665 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554245283019 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7462417193 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.611111111 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1047090455 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036079981704 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386910065494 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830135658207 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033334090426 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.