"Which of the following activities do you think will be the most beneficial to the environment? (1) Commute by biking or walking (2) Recycling (3) Eating a vegan diet"
Mistreatment of the environment has been a great danger for ecosystems creating a large amount of pollution. It has been said by researchers that the ecosystem will collapse in a few years. So that is why it is very important to take action and bring about a plan where we create a balance in the environment and where the ecosystem does not receive more harm. One of the activities that we should think about promoting is commuting by biking or walking for the following reasons.
To begin with, riding a bicycle, or walking, has many benefits, not only for the environment but also as a personal benefit. Cycling is an economic, simple, fun, healthy and eco-friendly transportation option. For instance, cycling every morning to work will reduce the expense of gasoline and vehicle repair. Cycling also provides some exercise at the beginning and the end of the day, which can help to burn some calories. Therefore, cycling will enhance muscle strength. Most office jobs provide the convenience of a shower in their facilities allowing these employees the opportunity to properly clean up and prepare for their professional duties. Finally, If we start cycling more, we would reduce pollution.
Next, biking and walking reduce the pollution and congestion that other methods of transportations emit. A great example of pollution is the car. A typical car produces tons of carbon dioxide per year, which is harmful for the environment. In addition, If we continue adding more pollution to the environment, we will start facing changes in the ecosystem such as pollution in the air, climate changes, etc. The pollution in the air can affect our health. In other words, we do need to breathe quality air, otherwise it might cause difficulty breathing, lungs problems and can raise the risks of other diseases. Under those circumstances, if people used more bicycles, it would reduce the need to build more cars. Therefore, the more cars we can get off the road, the better it will be for the environment.
All in all, starting to encourage people to use more bicycles instead of driving is a good start. Finally, riding a bike is easy to fit into our daily routine and can be managed for all ages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-06 | Vincent Samuel | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Naveena0 | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Vincent Samuel | 63 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Naveena0 | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | kevinkwon | 73 | view |
- Which of the following activities do you think will be the most beneficial to the environment 1 Commute by biking or walking 2 Recycling 3 Eating a vegan diet 73
- People should be realistic rather than romantic in order to live a better life 80
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully Others choose not to make any plans at all for their free time Compare the benefits of planning free time activities with the benefits of not 38
- It has been said Not everything that is learned is contained in books Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books In your opinion which source is more important Why 80
- If you were asked to send one thing representing your country to an international exhibition what would you choose Why Use specific reasons and details to explain your choice 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93010752688 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78345644546 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561827956989 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2754665271 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3333333333 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13784641047 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398842207163 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521077515385 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079281777974 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413669123696 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.