Parents regard their children as priceless treasures sent by angles, so there are different opinion on how parents should get their children ready for school. Even though some people think that the most effective way to do so is to teach children how to reead before entering the school, other people associate are a big fan of reading books for them. There is another group of individuals with whom I comply holding the idea that the parents should get their children involved in adults' conversation. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.
Without a doubt, the most consequential reason corroborating my stance on this subject is that involving in adults' discussion, not only can the children improve their communication skills, but they can also enhance their interpersonal abilites. Children usually face some issues when they enter a new envirnoment like school, partcularly during the first days and weeks. If they have a powerful communication skill they can find friend in more convenietn way and also can bond with their teachers better than other children who do not have this ability. Take me as an example, I remember my parents always let me to parcipate in their meetings with their friends or our neighbours. I did not talk in those meetings and even became bored soon after the meeting just began, but this helped me to improve my interpersonal and communication skills and face no difficulty in finding friends and talking to my teachers in school-time. Had my parents not decided to take me by themseleves to those sessions, I would not have been able to pass my firs weeks of my school. Therefore, this reason manifests that the most effective method to prepare children for school is to help them improve their communcation skill.
Although the previous reason is the firs one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is that children grasp knowledge and skills in a more unconscious way and yet quicker than adults or even teenagers. According to one survey, the learning rate among children (age 3 to 8) is twice the learning rate of adolescents (age 12 to 18). This ratio raises to more than fourth time compare to adults. Beside, there some abilities that are not taught in schools, and yet there necessary for each person to possess them. Communication ability is one of the most crucial ability that any person regardless of his gender and personality should have. It is so hard, and even sometimes impossible, for people to improve this ability in themseleves when they are mature. Consequently, it is the duty of parents to teach their give rise to this ability in their children. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that teaching children how to communicate is not only lucrative for their school-time, but it also provides them with innumerable priviliges in their future.
To make the long story short, many people are in favor of preparing children for school by teaching them how to read or reading them books. Nevertheless, the foregoing points lead us to conclude that teaching them the ability to communicate with other people is the best way to prepare a child for his school.
- Which one do you think is important to long lasting friendship 1 Help you when you need 2 Share same interest and hobby3 mutual trust 76
- It is more important to read and watch news presented by people whose opinion is different from your own view than by people whose opinion are similar to yours 76
- Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn and sugar cane has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States However many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons First th 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, even so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2681.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 541.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95563770795 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75748165139 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482439926063 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 820.8 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.416871723 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7619047619 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371987872967 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119489778854 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945021249578 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260273234921 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075013502956 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.