Which one do you think that government should invest in education or infrastructure?
It’s hard to say that infrastructure projects can create jobs for a society, and such a fact may mislead impressionable people to generate the opinion that our government should give priority of its investment to infrastructure instead of education. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. As far as effectiveness, economy, and equality are concerned, I strongly hold that our government should divert its investment to education.
First and foremost, it’s universally acknowledged that education is more effective than infrastructure in changing the world, as education generates greater long-term welfare for the society we live in. Meanwhile, in the long term, people will be able to learn more knowledge, enhance their professional skills, and change the world they live in. Not to mention the fact that these highly educated citizens will be able to build better, stronger, and more efficient infrastructure in the future to serve the whole society. And if we do not place enough weight on education, we will lack momentum in our future development, not only in the building of infrastructure but many other fields as well.
Furthermore, as far as the economy is concerned, the fact that education promotes the fundamentals of economic growth in the long-term indicates that the government should allocate resources to education. Take the case of Soft Union, which once diverted a huge amount of fund to education in science and engineering. As a result, educated people, such as Tupolev, revolutionized the framework of Soft Union’s industry and economy. These talents formed a synergy and transformed a poor country into one of the leading economies in the world. Had it not been for Soft Union’s heavy emphasis on education, Soft Union would never become a leading economy in the world.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that investment in infrastructure projects helps increase employment rate, boosting economy and creating better social equality. Ironically, the jobs added through such projects are only temporary, and do not help people in the long term. Poor people and their future generations still cannot move up to a better social class. Therefore, education is the true solution to tackle inequality in the society.
In a netshell, I maintain that our government ought to divert its financial resources to education. Admittedly, as my favorite quote from James Madison goes, as long as the reason of main continues fallible, different opinions will be formed, and some people may oppose me. However, I hold a firm belief that they will compromise after being exposed to my article.
- Which one do you think that government should invest in education or infrastructure 90
- Some college teachers prefer to ask students to watch or listen to a recorded lecture before class In class they will ask students to do more practices about what they have learned from the lecture Effective or not 81
- Some college teachers prefer to ask students to watch or listen to a recorded lecture before class In class they will ask students to do more practices about what they have learned from the lecture Effective or not 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2261.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04964596051 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531764705882 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5010273544 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3684210526 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226769571837 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635710746966 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509651151705 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111290293697 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572607480256 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 10.002688172 165% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.