Which one is the most important factor to help you work productively?
Having an environment free of noise and distractions;
Knowing that you will receive a reward;
Doing something you are interested in.
In this hectic era in which time is equal to or even higher than gold in terms of value, improving productivity in many areas such as employees' performance or students' studying raises to a hot topic. In this regard, opinions are divided when it comes to selecting the best way to improve work efficiency. Although some might opt for noise-free environment or expecting a reward as the main method to help productivity, I have a different point of view. As far as I am concerned, I believe that the privileges of being passionate about something basically outweigh those of other options for a number of reasons, two of which --- that is --- leveraging significant motivational forces and not getting tired are the most conspicuous ones.
First and foremost, a great source of motivation is a direct result of being interested in the work that one is doing. Moreover, such motivation can help everyone to get through harsh situations such as noise-full working office, having absolutely no income from work, or discouragement from others to name but a few. On the other hand, without this kind of motivation, which apparently is absent in many workforces, no one can finish their work even in perfect office environment. A personal example can drive this fact home. Once I had a colleague of mine when I was working as a Computer Engineer in my last job. Although his office was a dream house for many people because of the most up-to-date equipment, he could not manage to finish his task due to the lack of interest. Consequently, it is obvious that interest in the work is one of the most vital factors of productivity.
Secondly, a decent amount of passion for the work is enough to not get tired in the course of completing a project. To be clear, it is a well-known fact that getting tired or hopelessness is one the main source of failures. Thus, the only person who can survive this is a person who has faith in the project, which expectedly, is a result of being highly interested in his or her work. For example, PHD programs are commonly associated with depression, and force many students to quit the program and university. However, the most successful PhD students are the ones who believe in their works and can sidestep these temporal feelings. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that having an interest is one of the main parameters ensuring a superior productivity since it helps to overcome the well-known hopelessness which are common in many projects.
In view of those thoughts elaborated upon and many more, we reach the conclusion that indisputable having a strong passion about the work is a vital part of most productive workflows. There are many reasons for this, two of which -- that is -- enjoying a powerful motivation and overcoming tiredness in the middle of a project. Therefore, I believe that improving on this factor is a great start to strengthen the overall efficiency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | ashgharhoseini | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2425.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88911290323 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90364185119 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510080645161 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 764.1 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9043350791 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200889075154 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062145799648 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498903717172 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12416738402 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241745328387 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.