Which opinion do you agree with? Some people say that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others believe that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live.
Under the amelioration of human's living quality, the flourishing productivity of human has made a huge difference and change on the Earth. Considering this situation, there is a really controversial statement being discussing, which is human activities are harming the Earth. On the one hand, some people agreed with that since there is much pollution caused by human activities. However, there is a considerable number of people in the opposite. In my opinion, I do disagree with this statement that the Earth is harmed by people's activities. Comparing the earth in million years ago, human activities did exert a positive influence which made the Earth is a better place to live for us.
Firstly, every species in nature would change their own nearby environment to improve their living quality. Most every animal does this. As one part of nature, if people did not learn how to utilize the environment, our living standards would not be developed to today. For example, though it's self-evident the human being is the most intelligent, the study from the Department of Biology Science in Macau University shows, the behaviors which people could utilize the resource of nature to change the surrounding environment beneficially are the keys of intellective improvement of the human. In this way, the activity of all animal, include human activity, makes the Earth be changed to a better place to survive and live.
Secondly, the developing technology and productivity of human also help our Earth be better. The earth is the only place that called home for all lives in the present universe, which means we need to protect our Earth as well as possible. As far as this point, the human being has done many actions to ameliorate the regional climate and pollution. Last year in my city, the government signed up a document to force all the power plants to update the cleaning compressors in order to control the level of local air pollution, PM2.5 lower. As a result, the air in this year is much better than before. Therefore, people are also making good progress on protecting the Earth to make our only home better.
To sum up, human activity did a positive effect on the environment which makes us live better and have a more satisfactory life. We use advanced technology and our creative mind to reform the environment. So, there is no doubt that we make the Earth become a better place to live.
- Which opinion do you agree with? Some people say that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others believe that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. 73
- Do you agree or disagree that people should not have to pay for public transportation that they use 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To solve the problems of the present and the future, people should review the past. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Workers would be much happier if they are doing different types of tasks at the same time than doing the same task. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Only people who earn a lot of money are successful. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 568, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ples activities. Comparing the earth in million years ago, human activities did exert a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, no doubt, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92137592138 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74432326448 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8412270436 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.15 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.35 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48789423531 0.236089414692 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149182282844 0.076458572812 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106966852122 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304349186647 0.150856017488 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110648030076 0.0645574589148 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.