As far as I concern, People have been debating the pros and cons of the statement that working for long hours with high pay or short hours with less pay. For me, Family always comes first over money. From My personal view point, I strongly agree to work fewer hours and spend more time with my dear ones. for the following two rationales.
First of all, more time will give you an opportunity to build up strong relationship with your family and friends. As you have have more time to spend with the close people, you will get an opportunity to understand them better which makes your relationship stronger. Take my personal example to illustrate this, I remember when I was dating my husband few years ago, I was doing part-time job and we had so much time to spend together mostly on weekdays after the work. we went for the dinner, we had visited different places that helped us to understand each other better and that way we had true trust able strong bond between both of us which finally converted to life long married couple relations.
The another reason is that working fewer hours gives you a lot of time to do extra activities. If you have an extra time during a day after the work, you can use that time doing house hold chores, taking kids to the tutoring or sports. To illustrate this, I am going to give my personal example. I used to work very long hours for few months and I did not have a time for anything. Finally I started working short hours for few days, that gives me so much extra time to take care all house hold stuff and Now I personally making sure about my son's tutoring and his football game. That way It helped me to improve overall performance.
All in all, Working for short hours needs to be considered positively in terms of promoting to build up strong relationship with family and also help to improve overall performance. In general, I wholeheartedly believe that the very first thing we should do now is to admit the importance of spending time with family members as the key to open the door of our bleak future.
- TPO9 Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 83
- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725−1798) wrote a long memoir recounting hislife and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famouspeople, including kings and writers, his memoir has b 85
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 70
- If you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire : an experienced worker at a higher salary or inexperienced worker at a lower salary? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: LESS_DOLLARSMINUTESHOURS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer hours'?
Suggestion: fewer hours
...al view point, I strongly agree to work less hours and spend more time with my dear ones. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun hours is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...al view point, I strongly agree to work less hours and spend more time with my dear ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... and spend more time with my dear ones. for the following two rationales. First...
^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: have
...ip with your family and friends. As you have have more time to spend with the close peopl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...th your family and friends. As you have have more time to spend with the close peopl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...g my husband few years ago, I was doing part time job and we had so much time to spend to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...ther mostly on weekdays after the work. we went for the dinner, we had visited dif...
^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: HAVE_A_BREAKFAST[3]
Message: When we speak of types of meals, the article is not required: 'for dinner'.
Suggestion: for dinner
...tly on weekdays after the work. we went for the dinner, we had visited different places that h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: LESS_DOLLARSMINUTESHOURS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer hours'?
Suggestion: fewer hours
... The another reason is that working less hours gives you a lot of time to do extra act...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun hours is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... The another reason is that working less hours gives you a lot of time to do ext...
^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...and I did not have a time for anything. Finally I started working short hours for few d...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ally making sure about my sons tutoring and and his football game. That way It helped m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, so, in general, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46560846561 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3731559596 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2677270266 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.5376344086 217% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312654759208 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110900561133 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848893809283 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197238330323 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344980890548 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.