Why it is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own, due to the fact that you can learn from them and correct yourselves
Perhaps no subject in the world is as likely to cause so much controversy as the truth does. An issue in dispute is that whether the abosulute truth is attaintable or not. Some poeple advocate that with the truth at hand it is more important to wxpose ourselves to the media that approve our beliefs, while opponents suggest that since the truth is relative we can learn a great deal from others and correct our views. In my opinion, it is more imprtant to read or watch news presentend by people whose views are diffrent from my own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to mine, for two reasons.
First and foremost, I belive that no set of human views and belifes are completly true, so we most always be inclined to correct our ideas through exposing them to critisism and diffrent alternative views of our opponents. For example, I was born in Iran in a religious family. Therefore, my family and the educational system of islamic regime of Iran thought me that Islam is the only true persfective in the world and all other theories, perspectives and paradigms aro totally worng. As I grew older, I've read a lot about the alternative beliefs, so I learned that having a religion depends on the geographical location that you are born in. In fact, If I were born in india, It would be more likely that I was a hindu. As a consequent, I found out that truth is relative, so it's better to know our limitations and progress our limited knowledge by constant crtisizing and apeal to rationality. As newton once said "what we know is a drop, what we don't know is an ocean.".That's why I vote for the benefit of exposure to the difftent views and perspectives through news.
Secondly, if we just provide our selves with the similiar views, we are more suspectible to fell in the illusion of having the ultimate truth and to be oppresive and totalitarian. For instance, the Islamic repuplic of Iran is a totalitarian regime that acts violently toward people eho have diffrent opinions. This causes many problems for both people and government. Foer example in the presidential elections, an organization under the power of the supreme leader assign the candidates that people can choose from. Obviously, we can not call this kiond of election free because candidates with radically diffrent views are not among them, so many people don't have a representative in the hiarchy of power. In fact, many poeple think that we should mend our relations with the United States but the regime censor this view systematicaly. Consequently we have many financial problems in our country because of the America's sanctions. If the Islamic regime were more tolerant, we would have a better welfare. Therefore, I belive hearing the diffrent new and views is advantegous for both people and regimes.
From what has been discussed above one can reach a conclusion that It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own, due to the fact that you can learn from them and correct yourselves. In adittion, we would be less vulnerable to illusion of having the ultimate truth. In the end, I suggest that pepople should expose themselves to diffrent views by going to diffrent atmospheres.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | redark777 | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | janfaisal | 73 | view |
- test 1 3
- Why it is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own due to the fact that you can learn from them and correct you 73
- Learning ideas 83
- Why Governments should provide free internet access to people 90
- Importance of Information 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...gms aro totally worng. As I grew older, Ive read a lot about the alternative belief...
^^^
Line 3, column 956, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d 'what we know is a drop, what we dont know is an ocean.'.Thats why I vot...
^^^^
Line 3, column 985, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thats
...p, what we dont know is an ocean.'.Thats why I vote for the benefit of exposure ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 985, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...p, what we dont know is an ocean.'.Thats why I vote for the benefit of exposure ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 657, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...iews are not among them, so many people dont have a representative in the hiarchy of...
^^^^
Line 5, column 840, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
... regime censor this view systematicaly. Consequently we have many financial problems in our ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 15.1003584229 212% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 73.0 43.0788530466 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2776.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 584.0 407.700716846 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75342465753 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91590194646 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74870105285 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46404109589 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 882.0 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.3271071594 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.695652174 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3913043478 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388543761133 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920474488539 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190773503813 0.0737576698707 259% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305651611461 0.150856017488 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.241710353716 0.0645574589148 374% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.