at work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity- for example, you are given a task to complete that is very difficult from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to work alone or with others?
Today, by developing different organization method and standard systems, a large variety of tasks has a similar answering way, so people do not need to use creativity for solving them, but a few tasks would be solved by an innovative method, and same means cannot lead us to a significant answer. In this regard, managers refer tasks to their employees to solve them by their creativity either in the home or office. Although most of them prefer to do their works in the office with their co-workers, I strongly prefer to do my creative duties in the home to gain a better result. My reasons will be elaborated in the following passages.
Initially, one of the critical barriers of creative tasks is stress, which reduces human concentration on them. Co-workers usually transmit different types of stress to themselves by some statements such us: hurry up time is done; your process is wrong, change it; you are wasting materials, be careful; you cannot succeed; I would inform the boss. Mentioned statements, which sometimes are deliberate, not only do not motivate me to solve the tasks, but they also disturb my time and focus, and I usually failed the program. A study, which was done in a famous company shows that the creative projects stopped because their members could not concentrate on their jobs and usually had an argument with their co-workers. Then, methods of working changed, bosses permitted the members to do their jobs in their home and only present their results in the office. The results were amazing, 85 percent of the tasks were finished perfectly, and all of the customers were happy. Bosses mentioned in the results that if the changes had not done some years ago, they would not achieve great prosperity. In this regard, I prefer to do programs in the home to have a fever level of stress.
Next, a famous Persian proverb asserts, “Ten person's mind is more comprehensive than one's". This proverb states that different types of views can have a profound impact on our results, and admires idea challenging in answering. Although some people believe that by a different sort of view you can solve the innovative tasks better, I prefer to do it individually. By individual, you can focus on tasks more efficiently and search your question on the internet or papers, but working with others in an office would lead me to a vastly different idea that cannot be merged to an exact result. Consider a company that wants to create an electric machine. Bosses would choose a type of the material to reduce the final costs, mechanical engineers would change the design to increase its strength, and environmental experts would change them to decrease its harmful effects on the environment. Consequently, different types of design and material would be suggested without any useful result, but if the project had relegated to the engineering department without considering different views, it would have been created at the first step and then would be developed by different ideas.
To sum up, although working with others would distribute the duties and gives different types of view, I prefer to work individually to eliminate the extra stresses and distractive comments. For innovating we need to create singularly at first, and then develop it by others
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-05 | mohamad247 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Two people can still become good friends if one of them has more money than the other one does 85
- It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing It is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The telephone have a greater influence on people s lives than television has 76
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement The government should spend more money on improving access to the internet than on public transportation 68
- The government wants to fund the following to improve children s education 1 Hire more teachers to teach in a small class 2 Provide preschool education before kindergarten 3 To provide some training courses so that teachers can be more professional 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... elaborated in the following passages. Initially, one of the critical barriers ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 940, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... the tasks were finished perfectly, and all of the customers were happy. Bosses mentioned ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...home to have a fever level of stress. Next, a famous Persian proverb asserts, ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...Next, a famous Persian proverb asserts, “Ten persons mind is more comprehensive t...
^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...would be developed by different ideas. To sum up, although working with others ...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...first, and then develop it by others
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, then, sort of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2753.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 550.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00545454545 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72508336365 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501818181818 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 848.7 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.783237688 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.095238095 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1904761905 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04761904762 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209269319987 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603212326562 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054067157476 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136533659964 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00415361571698 0.0645574589148 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 86.8835125448 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.