working in a group or working a lone.
Some students prefer to study alone. It is easier for them to concentrate on the subject. Students feel they do a lot of progress when they study alone. Although I understand their point of view I have a different opinion. I believe that studying in a group is better, because it is a good chance to share the work among us. It provides more opportunity to understand the material better and studying in a group is more fun.
First studying in a group is a good chance to share the work among us. I remember when I was in collage; I used to do my entire project with three of my best friends. The professor assigned the project under our name. It was really amazing. I remember I and my friends when we stared to worked together we share the work between us. One of us has to prepare the materials for the project. The other one has to prepare a place for us to work. And, the third person collected the important information for the project. We usually submit our project on time. And our projects are all the time organized and neat. And we usually got high score. That is why I consider working in a group is beneficial for me and my friends.
Second, working in a group is better as it provides the chance to learn more. For example when I was in high school, I used to study with my friend. After school, we went to the library and study all together. Studying with my friends was helpful. If I miss some important information, my friend helps me out. If I did not understand the subject well my friends, I have the chance to discuss the material with my friend. For example, I remember once I was sick. I missed a biology class. One of my friends discussed the class for me and it was really helpful. That is why I consider working in a group has positive effect on us. We can learn more when we study in a group.
In conclusion, for the reason I mention above, I believe that working in a group is beneficial for us, as we can share the work between each other. Working in a group also is a good chance to learn.
- integrated sea otters 61
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- tpo integraded 33 -2 65
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 60
- technology creat a single world 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some students prefer to study alone. It ...
^^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... lot of progress when they study alone. Although I understand their point of view I have...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd studying in a group is more fun. First studying in a group is a good chan...
^^^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le, I remember once I was sick. I missed a biology class. One of my friends discu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, really, second, so, third, well, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.27532467532 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45902292095 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4 0.524837075471 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8337076604 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 53.0967741935 100.406767564 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.4193548387 20.6045352989 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.67741935484 5.45110844103 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26811112065 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877050295815 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130842034962 0.0737576698707 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224259575372 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114697827894 0.0645574589148 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 4.9 11.7677419355 42% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.68 58.1214874552 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.1575268817 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.66 10.9000537634 61% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.41 8.01818996416 80% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.