Acceptance of criticism, an important element of quality work, has been valued and triggers a heated discussion over success in a working group. Receiving criticism, in some people's views, has no effort on group work. Contrary to these people's opinion is my perspective that acceptance of criticism is beneficial, due to contributions to relationships with teammates and working efficiency.
What must be prioritized first is that accepting criticism, instead of ignoring it, will positively influence the relationships with teammates, by solving problems in a short time. To begin with, when someone was criticised, accepting these criticisms will benefit for relationships with its colleagues. To be more specific, for example, a polite and modesty teammate is better than a proud and self-righteous teammate, as a cooperator; however, the connection between someone and its teammate will weaken and easily be broken when it refused to accept other's opinions. Moreover, ignoring the criticism from the team leader will make people easily to lose their job. In detail, it is well-known that for anyone in the group who obey the rules and accept the criticism to get promotion.
What is equally worth discussing is that receiving criticism, rather than not, will exert a positive effect on working efficiency. Initially, taking changes and solving mistakes will impact the development of group work. Specifically, the later processes will not be able to move if people refuse to accept the mistake they took. In contrast, it is more possible for a group to deal with a sequence of tasks if they fix the problem quickly. Additionally, the average time cost in communication will be reduced by the acceptance of receiving criticism in a short time. To explain it further, the more people in the group acceptance criticism, the less communication time will team take.
Relationships with teammates, with convenient communication, will be closer by solving problems. Working efficiency, fixing problems quickly, will be improved by the less communication time. To conclude, only by accepting the criticism from others can people successful in a group.
- People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group 60
- People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO 52 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Disagree or agree It is impossible to be completely honest with your friend
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...effort on group work. Contrary to these peoples opinion is my perspective that acceptan...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40059347181 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10742712514 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510385756677 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.650584996 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.058823529 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456985682761 0.236089414692 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160530116394 0.076458572812 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841339840434 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310794580865 0.150856017488 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457337979502 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.