In the past several decades, the world has gone through massive changes on both an individual and a societal level. Despite the fact that some tough problems have been solved, there are still some complex issues remaining, one of them being world hunger. In order to figure out these problems, the debate over whether this problem can be addressed only by governments rather than individuals is still fierce. From my perspective, world hunger can only be figured out by governments and large companies.
To begin with, governments and large companies have more capital and technology to deal with world starvation. Nowadays, the development of technology is at speed beyond an average person's imagination. 3-D printer, one of the most ground-breaking technologies, is the representation of the Fourth Industrial revolution. Some regions are suffering from food shortages. In that case, a 3-D printer can be used to convert insect protein, considered an excellent food resource, into a more acceptable form and, in turn, provide people with more food choices. Nevertheless, research and development are never a small change; the development and production of 3-D printers need considerable money, which means they can only drive by a wealthy government or big companies.
Moreover, some may suggest that individuals can do something to tackle the problem of starvation. Undeniably, even a little of an individual’s voice can contribute to the situation, but if you ask me, this problem should be the response of the wealthy government and the large company. The reason why people pay taxes and transfer or release our power to the government is that they ought to represent people's will and realize it. If people want to address the world hunger problem, the government should fulfill this will. As for large companies, it is a great opportunity to give back to society. It is because there are plenty of people supporting them that they can have today's wealth and scale. Hence, they need to take responsibility for these problems.
In a nutshell, it is undoubtedly that such a problem can only be addressed and ought to be addressed by wealthy governments and large companies.
- Some universities have student leaders who are chosen by other students to perform important duties at the school for example meeting with school administrators to discuss problems at the school If your university required you to choose student leaders wh 76
- TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Students are more interested in politics now than they were in the past 80
- People who cannot accept criticism will not succeed working in teams 76
- Some parents enjoy giving their children weekly spending money for example they may give their primary or middle school child a small amount of money each week to spend on whatever the child wants Some people believe that this practice can cause childr 83
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...echnology is at speed beyond an average persons imagination. 3-D printer, one of the mo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, as for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16949152542 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97748689292 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550847457627 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7313628734 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382874181374 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114406756068 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850825911954 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248445107121 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607808041154 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...echnology is at speed beyond an average persons imagination. 3-D printer, one of the mo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, as for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16949152542 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97748689292 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550847457627 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7313628734 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382874181374 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114406756068 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850825911954 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248445107121 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607808041154 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.