You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or club. Do you agree or disagree that a person’s honesty is the most important thing to consider in deciding whom to vote for?
Use reasons and examples to support your position.
One of the rigors of current hectic life is finding way to manage our activities that lead to the satisfactory results at the end. Controversy exists over whether the concept of honesty should be the important feature for one person to be chosen as a leader. From my vantage point, however, there are other vital factors that have priority to the honesty and people have to consider them in choosing leader. Leaders not only have to be high schooled and knowledgeable person, but also they should have the ingenuity to cope with any problems come to the group.
The first aspect to point out is that some features play a key role in the groups that any leader should be equipped with. Leaders need to have many characteristic, but above all, they should have enough knowledge and skills to lead group in a best way. That is to say, though honesty is a better feature for everyone especially for leaders, it is not only and most important one. Take the case of students that are going to the field trip under supervision of a leader. In this regard, if we mention some factors respectively base on their importance, the first one could be knowledge. He or she should have sufficient knowledge to decide with place to go, to decide with information could be recorded, and the most important one the ability to answer to all the question that students might have. He or she should have ability to provide needed explanation and definition for any question in the trip to make it more useful for students.
A further more subtle point which deserves some words is that the leader needs some akills that are far important than being honesty. To illustrate, leaders should have the ability to control all the events happening in the group. They could use these skills and experience to motivate all members to struggle to their dreams. What is more, in many cases experience gives high hand to them than other factors. For instance, when I was in school we were supposed to have competition with other teams from other schools. Our team did good job and we reached to semifinal section to compete with strongest team to win. Our opponent team was very potent and it conveyed negative impression to our team at first, but our leaders used his experience and told some irrelevant information about them to the team, indeed he made lie in order to convey the sense of power and hope to the team and at the end we wined the game with two point. Thus, he was not honest that time, but by this way he helped use to win the game.
In conclusion leaders should have some crucial factors besides honesty that are important than it like knowledge. Moreover in some team, they have not to be honest in some occasion to help the group and it is worthy to do.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-17 | zhangjuw16 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics. 50
- Which would you choose: a higher pay job with long hours or an average pay job with normal work hours? Explain your choice, using specific reasons and details. 76
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic building or destroy them and replace them with the modern buildings? 70
- Your school is going to improve the teaching quality of the teachers of their high school students (ages 14-18), which of the following methods do you think is better:1. To choose a group of excellent teachers; the teachers will attend an additional train 86
- Which would you choose: a higher pay job with long hours or an average pay job with normal work hours? Explain your choice, using specific reasons and details. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...h knowledge and skills to lead group in a best way. That is to say, though honest...
^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the strongest'.
Suggestion: with the strongest
...reached to semifinal section to compete with strongest team to win. Our opponent team was very...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 833, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the team, indeed he made lie in order to convey the sense of power and hope to...
^^
Line 5, column 995, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...st that time, but by this way he helped use to win the game. In conclusion leaders...
^^^
Line 6, column 114, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...t are important than it like knowledge. Moreover in some team, they have not to be hones...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in many cases, what is more, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2257.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5967413442 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41763966757 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482688391039 0.524837075471 92% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5027782626 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.476190476 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.380952381 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141431092989 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510790943703 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469234334618 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985489008351 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315928915595 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.