You have long been friend with someone. If they do something that you don’t like ,
should you still be friends with him or her？
Friends are serving as an increasing significant and indispensable part of people’s life, as the companion could relieve us from the pressure from the academic or career challenges and family responsibilities. Thus, it has been advocated that friends keeping consistent with our own behaviors are supposed to be maintained, while those deviating from our norms should be abandoned, not only because the long-term disagreement would degrade the relationship ,but also argument would occur now and then with more time and exertion devoted to settle down the disputes. However, some dissenters claim that people should also accept friends whose behaviors are disapproved to them. As far as I am concerned, I am in agreement with the viewpoint above, and my reasons and examples are given below.
The first example is associated with the difference of the values. It is long believed that people’s physical behaviors are guided by their psychological recognition, which is shaped by personal experience, educational background and parental care. Obviously, these factors vary from person to person, indicating that it is unlikely to encounter someone else with virtually same stance with ourselves. Thus it is inevitable that reactions to certain circumstance differing between people, and divergence appears, irrelevant to the nature of the relation. As for friends, growing in diverse environment, it is understandable that one person’s behavior might be contradicted to the other’s values. However, if people make the resolution to maintain the relationship with whose behaviors constantly correspond to their expectation, the result would be shedding all his friends.
The second example comes from the novel perspective. Although the behavior is not preferred by the friend, it doesn’t mean that it is a wrong answer to the situation or unwelcome by others. The purpose of making friends lies on the broad view, since people are able to share joy, sorrow and personal opinions with others, and friends would patiently listen to the stories and be open to accept various viewpoints, which is beneficial to both sides. Nevertheless, when friends circle is constrained to people only according with our own rules, chances are that views that we are exposed to are limited and new ones are blocked outside. Consequently, friends are another copy of ourselves, repeating the preferred behaviors, and relation would be peaceful, though blend.
Admittedly, if some disliked behaviors have crossed the line, they would lead to the collapse of the friendship, including the illegal and immoral conduct. For instance, it is unacceptable if a girl has seduced her intimate friend’s boyfriend, because it not only hurts the other’s feeling, but also illustrates great flaws of one’s characteristic. Hence, it should be noticed that there is a line between the different levels of disliked actions, among which some are tolerable and might spice the relationship, while others are beyond the common sense.
From what has been discussed above, we can safely draw the conclusion that the relation should be continued, even if our friends have behaved in an disfavored way. As the society develops consistently and changes rapidly, higher standards and requirements have been proposed for the next generation, accompanying intense stress. Friends are suitable vent to release the negative emotion, and in return, disliked behaviors of our friends are allowed to occur as long as they conform to the public’s morality and the laws. Conclusively, precious as friendship is, it should be treated with more meticulousness and patience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-27 | Fiona Wong | 90 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 462, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...agreement would degrade the relationship ,but also argument would occur now and th...
^^
Line 2, column 407, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...h virtually same stance with ourselves. Thus it is inevitable that reactions to cert...
^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ed, even if our friends have behaved in an disfavored way. As the society develops...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, thus, while, as for, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 40.0 15.1003584229 265% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3102.0 1977.66487455 157% => OK
No of words: 564.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87326216964 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09795360414 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 314.0 212.727598566 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556737588652 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 952.2 618.680645161 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 14.0 3.51792114695 398% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.947439704 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31818181818 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274406887105 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777829078217 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421498012779 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162181062829 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413639616196 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 177.0 86.8835125448 204% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.