You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with them?

Essay topics:

You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with them?

As far as friendship has been considered as a major factor in every society wishing to become prosperous, there have suggested various, desperate ways that how friends should behave with each other. With this in mind, the question arise whether a person should keep his or her relationship with a friend whom acts a unacceptable and disliked deed or he should break down the relationship. While some people hold another notion, I, as a vision, support later ideas.
To begin with, should a friend threatens and damages the education quality of a person, and if that person do not see that, the one should not hesitate to finish that friendship, for his friend's activity results in several negative consequences in the individual's future. Post-school education is definitely necessary to get a job with a handsome salary, which is really competitive nowadays. A person who restricts his friend to study diligently, honestly, behaves as a treason and prevents his friend to become successful. My own experience contends this opinion. During my master's period, I used to have a friend who always encouraged me not to study hard and play computer games instead. I have often accepted his requested and given up my studies. As a result, I could not get a remarkable GPA. After the graduation, unfortunately, there was not available a well-paid job for me because of nothing but the poor GPA.
Apart from, without any shadow of doubt it is a logical choice to finish a friendship, if a friend endangers the person's health situation. There is nothing more invaluable than a healthy body; if an individual has a friend who promotes him or her to smoke, and if the person does not like to do that, beyond any doubt, the one must finish the relationship since smoking could again culminates in many disastrous results, as dedication. However, there exist some so-called social experts believe that friends should support each other in every situation and address to every requests, for it is the essence of friendship. These stratum of the community should be answered that a person must continue a relationship as long as it is not dangerous for him or her, not when it could endanger his health, job and etc.
All in all, whereas some argue that friends should accept every deeds and requests of each other, I reject it vehemently. It is suggested that not to keep a friendship if you do not like your friend behavior because it could ruin your job future or endanger your health.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-25 Armin Azad 80 view
2018-11-21 emadifahimeh@gmail.com 73 view
2018-04-01 sahar sadeghi 70 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...er relationship with a friend whom acts a unacceptable and disliked deed or he sh...
^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...a friendship, if a friend endangers the persons health situation. There is nothing more...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'culminate'
Suggestion: culminate
... relationship since smoking could again culminates in many disastrous results, as dedicati...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this stratum' or 'These strata', 'These stratums'?
Suggestion: This stratum; These strata; These stratums
...s, for it is the essence of friendship. These stratum of the community should be answered tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 804, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
... when it could endanger his health, job and etc. All in all, whereas some argue that f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 812, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... could endanger his health, job and etc. All in all, whereas some argue that frie...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, honestly, however, if, really, so, well, whereas, while, apart from, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87203791469 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77381587189 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53317535545 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.6552558769 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.941176471 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8235294118 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254274955868 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069571838262 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560512322084 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154266636728 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319684483924 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.