You must select a person to teach others to do a job. Which one of the following is the most important for you to consider in making your selection? the person’s education the person’s work experience the quality of the person’s previous work? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Most Congolese students prefer working in pairs. They select their peers according to their friends' performance at school. The reason behind this choice is that those students are inspired by their friends' achievements, so they prefer pairing up with them in order to learn skills from them. The ideal person to teach others to do a job are the highly achieving people because they know how to apply their jobs practically, they transfer effective skills to their successor due to their have a high level of mastery in their domain.
First, the quality of one's work and his or her productivity qualifies the person to be a good teacher of a specific skill. In fact, many people learn skills, but not all of them are able to apply them correctly in their daily lives. Productive people are able to apply their skills in the current life. For instance, one of my friends Malo Marcel was to teach our teacher Ephrem Kambale how to campaign for regional political position. Malo has achieved much in politics for many years. He assisted Ephrem in his campain. As a result, Ephrem succeeded. Ephrem made a great choice by chosing Malo. Malo had already accumulated enough experience in politics, and that is why he led Ephrem to success.
Second, people's achievements indicate a high level of mastery in a field. Thus, they will train their successors efficiently. Someone who have correctly completed his or her tasks obviously masters how to perform the job, which makes him or her a great teacher. For instance, Innocent Kwirika, a lead Congolese mathematician at Mwanga High School, Goma, DRC, was asked to teach his successor at Mwanga how to teach mathematics. The new teacher became highly achieving as Innocent because he was trained by a great mathematician. People who produce high quality jobs are fascinating resources to teach someone a skill because they transfer their mastery to their students.
To sum up, the best person to teach a skill should be the one who have a high quality outputs. People who have achieved well in the past know how to apply their skills practically, which willl also encourage learners to do the same. In addition, highly achieving people give great skills to their scholars that will enable them to also become masters as their teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-06 | PRACHI DAVE | 73 | view |
- The Principle of Scientific Management 83
- “Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of allowing television advertising to be directed toward young children (aged two to five). Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.” 76
- A good sense of humor is an important for humans. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- Altruism 76
- We all have favorite activities that we enjoy Write an essay convincing readers to try the activity that you enjoy the most 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 24, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... their domain. First, the quality of ones work and his or her productivity qualif...
^^^^
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'output'?
Suggestion: output
...ould be the one who have a high quality outputs. People who have achieved well in the p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, thus, well, as to, for instance, in addition, in fact, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92487046632 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58304056875 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492227979275 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4052928426 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4090909091 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04545454545 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11914225045 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379226727028 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493431872613 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794467784911 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165926106908 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.