young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their community
Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that young people are so sensitive to any types of social and political events, problems and decisions. They believe that involvement in community decision making is their right and also their responsibility. Thus, we can say that today young people spend even more time helping their society than young people do in the past. Contrary to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that today young people are so busy with their personal interest and wasting time for entertainment than have not ant time for social concerns. However, I, to a great extent, disagree with this idea that young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their community.
First and foremost, Today most political and social communities are organized and executed by people between age 20 to 30. For instance, during my undergraduate study at the university, I and my friends for the first time had conducted a free discussion between university manager and students. We had invited political figures like the president to university to answer to students questions.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that the widespread expansion of social networks assists young people in transferring important events and awarding society about threats. For example, last year the government decided to eliminate health insurance for mining workers. In spite of it, some young students produced a documentary from mining workers and their dangerous job condition. They transmit it to social networks. A lot of people start to protest against this decision and eventually, they became successful.
Finally, yet importantly, someone describes that today young people are too selfish and just think about their own welfare. This view is not a true judgement. If young people come together and to spend happy time with their friends, it does not mean that they neglect poor people. For example, In one of our party, we decided to start meeting with ill children and playing games and try to delight them.
On the basis of reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that young people quite worry about their society and spend a lot of time to help other ones. Because we see that the majority of social and political communities dedicated to young people and progress of technology assist them and they are happy individuals but still responsible for their country.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in spite of, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17512690355 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66099412665 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555837563452 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4514477039 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.315789474 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7368421053 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438677670166 0.236089414692 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125443397655 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136067002428 0.0737576698707 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229362489112 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168277541142 0.0645574589148 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.