Without a shadow of a doubt, attending university plays a pivotal role in finding a decent career in the modern world. An unanswered question in this area is whether it is more beneficial for students to choose short-term majors or majors which provide better job opportunities in the future. Despite the argument asserting that studying a field that guarantees their job in the future is a big investment, I believe otherwise, maintaining that students should graduate as soon as possible. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
The first exquisite point corroborating my stance on this subject is that studying a short-term major is a wise decision given the unpredictable nature of the modern world. Thanks to the development of technologies, the needs of societies change fast, and many people lose their careers or incomes. On the other hand, those individuals who follow trends constantly could earn a fortune in a short time. For instance, electronic engineering became so popular among students in my country in the last decade, and many students chose that as their major. When these students attained a degree in electronic engineering, winning a job position in this area was so competitive, and former alumni lost their careers. Therefore, students can not predict which occupations will be high-paying and sought-after in the future.
Another reason to be mentioned is that students who graduate faster are more like to enhance their income and position. Having several years of experience is essential for employers to hire job applicants because they want to avoid wasting their time and financial resources on incompetent clerks. Accordingly, if students select short-term majors and start their careers as soon as possible, they can gain experiences and skills that academic institutions do not offer to them in the job environment. For instance, had a friend of mine not studied a short-term economy major, he would not have got a promotion and increased their income.
Reflecting upon all the reasons mentioned above, one soon realizes that selecting majors with shorter years of study is a financially long-sighted decision.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for the government to spend money on art museums and concert halls than on recreational facilities such as swimming pools and playgrounds 76
- The university has provided students who are going to enter university with two summer vocation programs Which one do you think is better for students Take some college courses in advance e g some courses that are related to students major Visit some hist 85
- You have long been friends with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 90
- Students in a university club want to help others but they can only choose one project a year which one of the following is the best help those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics help people who cannot afford to build or rent 81
- After making a presentation in class you want to evaluate it Which of the following do you think would be better for you 1 Watch the recording by yourself 2 Invite other attenders to discuss and give opinions 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, so, therefore, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29714285714 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99836145729 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5198780162 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.6 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204003138005 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639429883853 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587482892407 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134312937814 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355490578215 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.