The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to discovery of clay jars which were not used to produce electricity and provides three reasons of supports. However, the professor explain that the factors given in the reading are not convincing and opposes each of the author's reasons.
First the reading passage discusses that copper cylinder which was found in jar, At first glance,it was thought to be used as electrical batteries, but this notion was crossed out when the archaeologist concurred that even it could have been, they needed to electrical wire which enable to connect the batteries. Moreover, there was none at that times. In contrary, the professor provides information that indeed jar was found by local residents not by archaeologist, It is crucial to consider that there was possibility that maybe local people could have not recognized all useful items and consequently, they threw away some essential tools. Clearly, a disparity exists between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor. As a result, we can safely assume that copper cylinder might have been used for generating electricity if the jars had been found by archaeologist so they might have been identified the wires if present.
Second, the reading pushed fort the idea, the copper cylinder which were found is same one with the one that found close to the Selenue, and it was used to hold the sacred text. Nevertheless, the professor contends that by explaining it is originally used to hold textures, but it does not prove that it cannot be used in order to generate electricity. Consequently, we can argue that the claim made in the reading is substantiated.
Finally, the reading posits that using batteries or electricity has no point at all. The professor refutes this point by explaining that it may be used healing processes by ancient doctors. We also learn that it can relieve pain in muscle in which electricity is still used to diminish the pains in muscles.
In summary, while both the reading and the lecture provide interesting information with regard to vessel and copper cylinder, a significant amount of evidence support that the listening has more legitimate and convincing reasons. Therefore, the article fails to justify the claim toward the professor.
- frog decline 88
- A foreign visitor has only one day to spend in your country. Where should this visitor go on that day? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 80
- Some people like to do only what they like already do well. Other people prefer to try new things and take risk. Which one do you prefer? 80
- it is important to know event all over the world, even if it is unlikely affect your life? 80
- The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to type of working schedules and provides few reasons of support. However, the professor explain that it has some negative effect and opposes each of the author's reasons. 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in fact, in summary, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 345.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17971014493 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80055205048 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510144927536 0.540411800872 94% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8472214861 49.2860985944 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.642857143 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06452816374 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.079464300591 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0262050982522 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317215446613 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0405426371055 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351724617691 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.