The text and lecture has two opposing views on the storyline of the Gone with the wind and it's characters. According to the text, it can be assumed that the allegations of racim which caused the movie under great fire are true, whereas the professor seemed skeptical about those allegations of racsim. She thinks that the movie rather gave more opportunties to people than portraying negative impact.
Firstly, the professor directly takes side of the movie by stating that war was never considered to be a good idea as per the movie, infact it was considered to be rash in so many wrong ways. However, she supports that after the civil war, the african women were offerered with so many better opportunities. Although, acoording to the text they had to work as slaves but the profressors thinks atleast they had something else to do rather than just focusing on their family life.
Secondly, as the text expalins that movie failed to do juctice with the characters who acted as slaves. It was said that those charcters were potrayed as extremely submissive role in comparison with the main character and it didnot have any significant amount of impact in the Film. However, the professor completely refute with this part of passage. Because she thinks that characters like Mammy and Prissy were so prominent in their own ways. They both conveyed a concrete message to general public. Since both of the characters were played by black african women, this infact encourged other black people men or women to work in films.
In conclusion, the professor completely dis-aggreed with the allegations of racisim which were stated in the passage by saying that the movie had much more to offer to public. And that this movie has taken hollywood to awhole new level.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people than portraying negative impact. Firstly, the professor directly takes si...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...hey both conveyed a concrete message to general public. Since both of the characters were play...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 640, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k people men or women to work in films. In conclusion, the professor completely ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91638795987 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5422328457 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555183946488 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5901400352 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102959684732 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384763065985 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027654847703 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663388558916 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148845472651 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.