According to the reading passage, it is stated that some archaeologists believe that the coin discovered at a Native American archaeological site, is a historical fake rather than an original piece of historical evidence. The passage asserts that they deem this coin has placed recently by someone for the purpose of misinforming the public, and it provides three reasons to deal with the problem. However, the professor in the listening states, why the assumptions mentioned in the reading passage were not correct and refutes them by describing three reasons as follows.
Firstly, the reading claims that due to the great distance of the Native American site from Norse settlements, it is concluded that the coin has no connection with the settlements. The professor casts doubt on this point by saying that not only coin but also other objects came from far distances. He mentions that the main site people used to travel distances, and after they reached the north settlement, they brought back objects from there to their own site.
Secondly, the article posits that another obstacle of this issue is that no other coins have been discovered in the Canadian sites; therefore, no silver coins were brought to American settlements by the Norse. In contrast, the professor says that when the Norse used to go back to the Europe, pack up all silver coins, and take them to North America. When they returned to the Europe again, they took the coins back there with themselves; because of this, there is no finding of other coins in the region of Canadian sites.
Finally, the reading says that despite the fact that silver coins were widely in use in the Europe at that time, the Norse were of the opinion that North American will not consider silver coins as money. The professor opposes this point by explaining that native North Americans used to consider the attractiveness valuable, and they were fond of silver appealing beauties like jewelries. Unlike what the reading passage says, these coins were useful among the North American either; because they used coins to trade with such valuable things.
- TPO56 76
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern 86
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other hand conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible First atmospheric pre 65
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 80
- are negatives of photographs ansel adams work or not 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y describing three reasons as follows. Firstly, the reading claims that due to ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... objects from there to their own site. Secondly, the article posits that anothe...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...coins in the region of Canadian sites. Finally, the reading says that despite t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 549, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ins to trade with such valuable things.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 351.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01709401709 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52282379436 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501424501425 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.0396544598 49.2860985944 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 146.75 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26339426192 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101912393545 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659929720818 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160438218572 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00894387086176 0.0443174109184 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.