In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life-forms on Mars.First, under an electron microscope, one can see tiry fossils on the meteorite with shapes similar to Earth bacteria. Like Earth bacteria, the meteorite fossils aretube-like and segmented (i.e, composed of little segments or sections).Second, scientists found special chemical compounds in the meteorite that appear to be of bacterial origin. Thee compounds are molecules with guite acomplicated structure. On Earth such compounds often arise when simple organisms like bacteria decompose Thus the best explanation of the compounds on themeteorite is that they formed from similar decomposing organisms on Mars.Thirc. researchers discovered crains of macnette la maanetic mineral) in the meteorte that are similar to macnetite crains produced by bacteria on Earth. Earthbacteria use such maonetic grains as a sort of compass to navicate their movement using Earth's macnetic feld. The grains on the Martian meteorite are vensimiar in size. shape. and stucture to those proouced oy Earth bacteria. which makes it likey that they have been oroduced by bacteria on Mars.
Discovery found meteorite that came from Mars has some characrteristics suggested the existence of life-forms on Mars. But in the lecture the man disagree with the discover.
Firstly, in the reading passage people found tiny fossils on the meteorite that looks like the bacteria on Earth, they are both tube-like. But the lectureor states that the shape is miss leading because it is not reall. The shape of it can change when people are preoparing it.
Secondly, the author of the artical tell that there is special chemical compounds in the meteorite that looks like bacteria origin. On the other hand, in the talk people can know that the chemical could not be bacteria. There are a lot of thing that can produce the same thing, such as volcano. So the chemical should be produced by marshall volcano.
Lastly, in the artical reaserchers found grains of magnitite just like the magnetite grains produced by bacteria on Earth. While in the listening the man thinks that the gains of magnitite was not been produced by bacteria on Mars because unlike Earth the maginetic field is strong, the maginetic field is so weak on Mars, so it is useless for the bacteria.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | Sheraleelyle | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Sheraleelyle | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Sheraleelyle | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Sheraleelyle | view | |
| 2023-07-27 | Sheraleelyle | 80 | view |
- In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life forms on Mars First under an electron microscope one can see tiry foss
- In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life forms on Mars First under an electron microscope one can see tiry foss 80
- In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life forms on Mars First under an electron microscope one can see tiry foss 70
- In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life forms on Mars First under an electron microscope one can see tiry foss 78
- In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life forms on Mars First under an electron microscope one can see tiry foss 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ut in the lecture the man disagree with the discover. Firstly, in the reading passage pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the man disagree with the discover. Firstly, in the reading passage people f...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...change when people are preoparing it. Secondly, the author of the artical tell...
^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of things'.
Suggestion: a lot of things
...emical could not be bacteria. There are a lot of thing that can produce the same thing, such a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould be produced by marshall volcano. Lastly, in the artical reaserchers found...
^^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'was not' or 'has not been'?
Suggestion: was not; has not been
... man thinks that the gains of magnitite was not been produced by bacteria on Mars because un...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 200.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.835 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52724652537 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6114676843 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9090909091 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129175247245 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507500776306 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757565364717 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947160579178 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775184022502 0.0443174109184 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 63.6247240618 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.