The author cites three methods to protect the forests from the threat of P.ramorum, a kind of fungus, in the reading material. Nevertheless, the lecture lecturer's lecturer argues that the reading material methods are ineffective and impractical and opposes them accordingly.
First and foremost, the author claims that since the spores spread with humans' assistance, taking some methods to change certain human behaviors can be an effective and low-cost way to stop the spread of P.ramorum. However, the lecturer offers the opposite opinion that despite human-assisted, there is another way for the spores spread, which is harder to control, water-assisted spread - the spores merged with rainwater falls into streams and goes far away.
Besides, the lecturer casts doubt on the author's other method that fungicidal chemicals, which defenses against the P.ramorum fungus and reduces infection possibility, can protect the oak trees. The lecturer demonstrates that the chemicals only work when they are injected directly into the tree's trunk. Meanwhile, the injection's effect lasts just a few months. Hence, it will be too expensive and impractical to inject every individual in a forest with thousands of trees.
Finally, the author's third method, an approach called clear-cutting (clearing large areas of vegetation in places where diseased trees found), is an efficient measure to stop the infections spread, is also counteracted by the lecturer. The lecturer points out that even though this kind of sacrifice may sometimes work, it will destroy those health vegetation, including rare species of trees that cannot quickly grow back. The ecological damage of rare trees loss will be even more significant than the P.ramorum's.
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called phytophthora ramorum or P ramorum was first detected in the forests of the western United States P ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees in many infected oaks leaves wither rapidly la 85
- TPO 35 In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book manuscript written on vellum vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper The Voynich manuscript as it 80
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago there was a mass extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 50
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 90
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...hen they are injected directly into the trees trunk. Meanwhile, the injections effect...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this health' or 'those healths'?
Suggestion: this health; those healths
...ice may sometimes work, it will destroy those health vegetation, including rare species of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, third, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79395728485 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646616541353 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5087326045 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146652686916 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542387353232 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499639168649 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837142270498 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034258191919 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...hen they are injected directly into the trees trunk. Meanwhile, the injections effect...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this health' or 'those healths'?
Suggestion: this health; those healths
...ice may sometimes work, it will destroy those health vegetation, including rare species of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, third, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79395728485 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646616541353 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5087326045 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146652686916 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542387353232 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499639168649 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837142270498 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034258191919 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.