abcd
The passage discusses about a recently found painting and its relation with a 19th century painter named as Whistler. The passage espouses that the painting is a work of Whistler and gives three reasons for the same. The lecturer refutes those claims and gives counter reasons to prove that the painting is not a work of Whistler.
Firstly, the passage states that Whistler's friend included the painting in an exhibition of painting in London. And as he was a close friend of Whistler, it is assumed that he believed the painting to be of Whistler. Opposing this argument, the lecturer stated that the exhibition was not of Whistler's painting. It was a common exhibition. The friend could have included that painting only because he owned it.
Furthermore, the passage states that the woman in the paining clearly resembles to the woman in "Symphony in White", which was an artwork of Whistler. Also the style resembled that of Whistler's by use of monochromatic palate with lots of black, grays and whites, used by Whistler in his famous painting. In counterpoint, the lecturer clarifies that the woman used to be a very famous model in those days and she featured in many other paintings at that time. Moreover usage of Black and white colour does not mean it was Whistler's work. Many artists at that time preferred monochromatic palates.
Lastly, the passage argues that the painting consisted of a butterfly in the lower right corner of the painting which Whistler usually draws as his signature. The lecturer rebut that claim and states that the butterfly is totally of different shape and colour. Moreover, Whistler used to paint his signature in the Upper left corner of the painting. Further analysis of the painting showed that the butterfly has been added later in the painting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-14 | 1261906566 | 3 | view |
| 2018-09-27 | vampypandya | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r and gives three reasons for the same. The lecturer refutes those claims and gives...
^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...pos;, which was an artwork of Whistler. Also the style resembled that of Whistlers b...
^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...d in many other paintings at that time. Moreover usage of Black and white colour does no...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'rebuts'.
Suggestion: rebuts
...ly draws as his signature. The lecturer rebut that claim and states that the butterfl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00332225914 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68662121947 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471760797342 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5991718733 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5882352941 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76470588235 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.