about putting barrier TED on the boat.
The lecture and the reading passage talk about the TED mechanism, which uses a barrier in the middle of the net that uses for catch shrimps in boats to prevent catching large animals and to keep them safe from death. The reading claims that its good idea that can be implemented on the actual environment and it is beneficial. The lecture refutes this by saying it is not a far perfect method also it is hard to enforce all sailors to put them.
First of all, the reading claims that this barrier will just catch the small animals, while the large one will find the exit easily. The lecture argued that by saying this barrier can catch small turtles like insects and they will die, while there are no purposes from them.
In addition, the reading claims that there will be a special organization to check on every passing boat to ensure that they all have TED on their boats. The lecture counters this by saying it will be easy to remove it by the owners to make more profit, while it will be hard to observe them in the sea.
Lastly, the reading argues that the country will control the importing process, and it will be allowed for just the certified boats with TED to sell their product, while the other will be. The lecture refutes this by pointing out that many of the owners can deliver fake documents, and this process will be confusing because the certification will be changed based on the country, so it is hard to distinguish if it real or fake among a huge number of countries.
- The altruism in animals and humans 78
- in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today?agree or not 60
- our life is much easier that our parents life 76
- building a factory in your region? 60
- do you agree or disagree that students should take a history class whether their field is in history or not. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ctual environment and it is beneficial. The lecture refutes this by saying it is no...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, lastly, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49084249084 5.08290768461 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22331951065 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498168498168 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7700886919 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.222222222 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 21.698381199 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154583797321 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067507213827 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673382029717 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100020967375 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627600697691 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 12.2367328918 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.