Both reading and listening passages are about altruism, human or animal perform selfishness actions that are beneficial for others.
First, according to the reading passage, meerkats are a perfect instance of performing altruistic actions. In a group often one individual acts as a guard, looking for predators, while others are hunting for food. They put themselves in risk for others' interests. However, the professor refutes this claim, asserting that individual acts as a sentinel only with a full stomach.
Secondly, in the reading passage, it is stated that the sentinel meerkat gives alarm in order to alert others about danger, so they can seek for shelter. Notwithstanding, this point is challenged by the professor. She claims that often the sentinel stand near the burrow, therefore they can hide faster from predators.
Finally, the article establishes that organ donors receive nothing for their help. However, the professor argues that people, who were the donors gain recognition in the society and approval from their surroundings.
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? Use specific reasons and examples to support your own op 76
- Professors' appear on TV 88
- Altruism and meerkats' study 80
- Altruism and study of meerkats 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 1373.03311258 65% => OK
No of words: 163.0 270.72406181 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48466257669 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 4.04702891845 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77307399884 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.662576687117 0.540411800872 123% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 419.366225166 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8779856856 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.074314362291 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0265062125425 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410217577825 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0446037942237 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030845772735 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.