Apparently, there has been a debate between scientists about the causes of the ice age
Apparently, there has been a debate between scientists about the causes of the ice age, a group of scientists suggests three theories explain this phenomenon which represented in the reading passage, while another recent studies refutes all these theories and said that all of them were indeed, unlikely to cause the ice age, as the professor explains in the lecture.
First of all, the professor asserts that the first theory in the reading passage does not convincing enough, because the golf stream disruption which had been caused as a result of increase in the ocean water level, were caused just in Europe and in South America, this effect did not happen in Africa or North America, as long with this fact, we can not rely on this theory to explain the ice age in all over the world as the author assumes.
Second, the professor maintains the opposite opinion regarding the volcanic eruption theory, he contends that, if the amount of the ash that had been emitted from the volcano was huge enough to cause the ice age, that mean, it suppose to cause a dramatic vision effects, like seeing the ice in gray color instead of white, in fact, there are no reports talking about such a kind of effect, that in turn lead to make the author argument unbelievable.
Finally, the lecture critics the third theory about the effect of decreasing in human population at that time which lead to increase the forest areas, besides that, decrease in carbon dioxide concentration, which lead to reduction in green gas roles in keeping the weather warm, by claiming that, this effect to be truly happened, it needs a long time, while the population reduction rapidly developed to appropriate level, that mean this cause practically not true.
- Recently, there has been a debate about a measure called "salvage logging" to help the forest recovery after fire and disaster. Salvage logging means removal of dead trees after disasters and fire. 73
- Recently, there has been a debate about the (let it burn policy), which means that letting the forest burns without suppression the fire. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were live in the past. 73
- Apparently, there has been a historical debate about the reality of reaching the North pole by Robert e beary . 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the professor explains in the lecture. First of all, the professor asserts that...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'convince'
Suggestion: convince
... theory in the reading passage does not convincing enough, because the golf stream disrupt...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... over the world as the author assumes. Second, the professor maintains the oppo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'supposes'?
Suggestion: supposes
...ugh to cause the ice age, that mean, it suppose to cause a dramatic vision effects, lik...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...make the author argument unbelievable. Finally, the lecture critics the third t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, finally, first, if, regarding, second, so, third, while, in fact, kind of, talking about, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86486486486 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43580846797 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 74.0 21.2450331126 348% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.9670910131 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 360.0 110.228320801 327% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 74.0 21.698381199 341% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 34.0 7.06452816374 481% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330143402811 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204005995397 0.0996497079465 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158153154284 0.0662205650399 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204005995397 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158153154284 0.0443174109184 357% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 38.5 13.3589403974 288% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 4.83 53.8541721854 9% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 31.0 11.0289183223 281% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.09 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.09 8.42419426049 132% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 10.7273730684 256% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 31.6 10.498013245 301% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.