The article and the lecture are about coal ash, which is the waste of power plants, and its effect into the environment consequently, it is suggested that new regulations must be incorporated to the process of energy. The author in the passage believes that some policies have been already implemented in order to reduce the effect of the chemical presented in the production of power. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the claims made by the author. She thinks that those ideas do not seem to see practical.
First, the author claims that the power company has implemented the use of liner-special material which prevents coal ash components from polluting the atmosphere. Nevertheless, this statement is challenged by the lecturer who posits that this policy is just required for new sites of the company. Therefore, chemicals emit by the decomposition of this waste still continue harming the soil and the water of the surroundings. She states that new strict regulated must be required no only for old building but also for new ones.
Second, the article exposes that another technique used by power companies is recycling. The author explains that most of the coal ash is recycled in order to use it for building new materials such as concrete and bricks. Nonetheless, the lecturer discredits this proposal by explaining that clients may not trust material recycled when they are harmful to the environment. Furthermore, she points out that recycled mercury is one compelling example of this because it is unlikely that customers but this material.
Finally, the author mentions that the implementation of strict rules may involve an increase not only in costs of production but also in the price of electricity. The lecturer, on the other hand, puts forth the idea that this new regulation may not increase so much the cost of production because it will be only 1% of the costs that the companies spend. Consequently, people will be willing to spend a little more money because the increase in the price of electricity will not increase so much and exclusively because it will help the environment.
The article and the lecture are about coal ash, which is the waste of power plants, and its effect into the environment consequently, it is suggested that new regulations must be incorporated to the process of energy. The author in the passage believes that some policies have been already implemented in order to reduce the effect of the chemical presented in the production of power. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the claims made by the author. She thinks that those ideas do not seem to see practical.
First, the author claims that the power company has implemented the use of liner-special material which prevents coal ash components from polluting the atmosphere. Nevertheless, this statement is challenged by the lecturer who posits that this policy is just required for new sites of the company. Therefore, chemicals emit by the decomposition of this waste still continue harming the soil and the water of the surroundings. She states that new strict regulated must be required no only for old building but also for new ones.
Second, the article exposes that another technique used by power companies is recycling. The author explains that most of the coal ash is recycled in order to use it for building new materials such as concrete and bricks. Nonetheless, the lecturer discredits this proposal by explaining that clients may not trust material recycled when they are harmful to the environment. Furthermore, she points out that recycled mercury is one compelling example of this because it is unlikely that customers but this material.
Finally, the author mentions that the implementation of strict rules may involve an increase not only in costs of production but also in the price of electricity. The lecturer, on the other hand, puts forth the idea that this new regulation may not increase so much the cost of production because it will be only 1% of the costs that the companies spend. Consequently, people will be willing to spend a little more money because the increase in the price of electricity will not increase so much and exclusively because it will help the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-26 | Joe Cedillo | 80 | view |
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 61
- The article and the lecture are about three theories which pretend to explain the meaning or the purpose of some carved stone balls that dated around 4000 years ago. The author in the passage believes that these hypotheses have some evidence that supports 80
- Undoubtedly, technology has improved our lives in several ways. Some people prefer to have a great access to the internet while others prefer to have an efficient public transportation. Both have positive aspects that people should consider in order to ma 76
- A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see one. In 1768 the animal became ex 80
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, still, therefore, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 350.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03714285714 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85002685272 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508571428571 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7417279754 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.533333333 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354959810536 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116912927613 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.203088199638 0.0662205650399 307% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231576610336 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.220990909457 0.0443174109184 499% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.