The article states that as many product buyers would not trust the common advertisements which showed in newspapers or tv, companies have decided to test a new way. This method uses some people in public places, such as subway or malls, to talk to other people and convince them to buy their products. Many critics ignore this method as immoral way. The author provides three reasons to support these critics' opinions. However, a man who speaks in the article as a buzzer says that these points are not true and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that as consumers do not have any pieces of information about the buzzers, whether if they take money from the company or not, they would not expect that the people who talk them about the product is a buzzer and has some benefits from this costume. The man refutes this opinion by saying that although the buzzers paid by companies to introduce their products and convince consumers to buy that, they would not introduce that if they are not interested in that product. So they bought the product before and after that paid by companies to tell something true about that.
Second, the article posits that as the consumers do not have any expectations about people who buzz them, they would not focus on the buzzers' claim and ask fewer questions about the products and investigate less than the time when they watch TV advertisements. However, the buzzer man says that although the consumers do not know anything about our aims and benefits of talking to them, they ask a lot of questions about the product and would not buy that if they consider this product is not beneficial.
Third, the reading says that buzzing has bad effects on social relationships because decreases the trust between people. The man opposes this point by explaining that the buzzers are also from society and if they do not like the products they would not offer that to other people.
The article states that as many product buyers would not trust the common advertisements which showed in newspapers or tv, companies have decided to test a new way. This method uses some people in public places, such as subway or malls, to talk to other people and convince them to buy their products. Many critics ignore this method as immoral way. The author provides three reasons to support these critics' opinions. However, a man who speaks in the article as a buzzer says that these points are not true and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that as consumers do not have any pieces of information about the buzzers, whether if they take money from the company or not, they would not expect that the people who talk them about the product is a buzzer and has some benefits from this costume. The man refutes this opinion by saying that although the buzzers paid by companies to introduce their products and convince consumers to buy that, they would not introduce that if they are not interested in that product. So they bought the product before and after that paid by companies to tell something true about that.
Second, the article posits that as the consumers do not have any expectations about people who buzz them, they would not focus on the buzzers' claim and ask fewer questions about the products and investigate less than the time when they watch TV advertisements. However, the buzzer man says that although the consumers do not know anything about our aims and benefits of talking to them, they ask a lot of questions about the product and would not buy that if they consider this product is not beneficial.
Third, the reading says that buzzing has bad effects on social relationships because decreases the trust between people. The man opposes this point by explaining that the buzzers are also from society and if they do not like the products they would not offer that to other people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-02 | ali.hasani1992 | 3 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- TPO 29 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend money on salaries university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to to support your answer 70
- TPO 34 70
- One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them take a part time job 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 337.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77448071217 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36004122299 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456973293769 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.636621609 49.2860985944 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.083333333 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0833333333 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.0289183223 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.