The author and the lecturer are both about assigning tasks to a group of people instead of indivisuals. the writter feels that finnishing tasks in groups is beneficial for companies but the lecturer challenges these claims. he is of the oppinion that not only concluding a gob is not beneficial but also it might hurt the companies progress. He gives an example of a compnie which took such an approach and faced consequenses not mentioned in the writing.
To begin with, the article argues that works are done more quickly since a group have a wider range of skills, expertise and, knowledge. Also, the more labor, the faster projects are finished. This specific argument is challenged by the speaker. He claims that in the firm, some employees where less contributed to the goal and recieved a free ride and as a result when the project was finished the received the same credit as those who worked hard. This equal reward caused hard working assets become less incentive.
Secondly, the reading suggests a group is more likely to take risks and consequently more creative solution might be proposed by the group. the lecturer however, rebuts this idea by stating, influential people can affect the decisions made in agroup. The more influential a person, the more inherents he has. Those people can introduce ideas or define procedures and otheres will follow them blindly and consequently wrong decisions can be followed for a long time and cause a lot of hurm. the blind acceptence can cause ignorance the propositions of those who might be right.
The author and the lecturer are both about assigning tasks to a group of people instead of individuals. the writer feels that finishing tasks in groups is beneficial for companies but the lecturer challenges these claims. he is of the opinion that not only concluding a gob is not beneficial but also it might hurt the companies progress. He gives an example of a companies which took such an approach and faced consequences not mentioned in the writing.
To begin with, the article argues that works are done more quickly since a group have a wider range of skills, expertise and, knowledge. Also, the more labor, the faster projects are finished. This specific argument is challenged by the speaker. He claims that in the firm, some employees where less contributed to the goal and received a free ride and as a result when the project was finished the received the same credit as those who worked hard. This equal reward caused hard working assets become less incentive.
Secondly, the reading suggests a group is more likely to take risks and consequently more creative solution might be proposed by the group. the lecturer however, rebut this idea by stating, influential people can affect the decisions made in a group. The more influential a person, the more inherent he has. Those people can introduce ideas or define procedures and others will follow them blindly and consequently wrong decisions can be followed for a long time and cause a lot of harm. the blind acceptance can cause ignorance the propositions of those who might be right.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | mahan vahab kashi | 3 | view |
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus the projec 3
- In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer of 1 60
- the opinion pf celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 73
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task 3
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...group of people instead of individuals. the writer feels that finishing tasks in gr...
^^^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...t the lecturer challenges these claims. he is of the opinion that not only conclud...
^^
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a company' or simply 'companies'?
Suggestion: a company; companies
...panies progress. He gives an example of a companies which took such an approach and faced c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s where less contributed to the goal and received a free ride and as a result whe...
^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...olution might be proposed by the group. the lecturer however, rebut this idea by st...
^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...or a long time and cause a lot of harm. the blind acceptance can cause ignorance th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, second, secondly, so, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92015209125 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63536777238 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593155893536 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9164907895 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4285714286 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0658118700156 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0226420414481 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444811543908 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.047454473701 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671107603032 0.0443174109184 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.