The author states about the thoughts that some archaeologists had about the vessels that were used as electric batteries in ancient times. as opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these thoughts do not seem convincing.
First and foremost, the writer mentions that weren't any evidence that these vessels were used as batteries. If they were used as such, they would probably have been attached to some electricity conductor. On the contrary, the professor cannot disagree more, reasoning that these vessels were found by villagers who weren't train to do that. These local people might have not found the other parts interesting. Therefore, they may have thrown away the other parts.
The second argument the author gives is that the cooper cylinder inside the jarslook exactly like copper cylinder discovered in the ruins of Seleucia. Therefore, they thought these were use for the same purpose. However, the lecturer cannot be more outraged, explaining that even though, these jars are similar, still it might be adapted for another usage. Actually, dose not prove anything that those were used for exact the same purpose.
Lastly, on one hand, the passage points out that ancient people could have used these vessels, but it was not any device that relied on electricity. Nevertheless, the professor declaring that was a visible use of that, doctors used these to heal different muscles problems and as magic power.
.
The author states about the thoughts that some archaeologists had about the vessels that were used as electric batteries in ancient times. as opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these thoughts do not seem convincing.
First and foremost, the writer mentions that weren't any evidence that these vessels were used as batteries. If they were used as such, they would probably have been attached to some electricity conductor. On the contrary, the professor cannot disagree more, reasoning that these vessels were found by villagers who weren't train to do that. These local people might have not found the other parts interesting. Therefore, they may have thrown away the other parts.
The second argument the author gives is that the cooper cylinder inside the jarslook exactly like copper cylinder discovered in the ruins of Seleucia. Therefore, they thought these were use for the same purpose. However, the lecturer cannot be more outraged, explaining that even though, these jars are similar, still it might be adapted for another usage. Actually, dose not prove anything that those were used for exact the same purpose.
Lastly, on one hand, the passage points out that ancient people could have used these vessels, but it was not any device that relied on electricity. Nevertheless, the professor declaring that was a visible use of that, doctors used these to heal different muscles problems and as magic power.
.
- The author states the methods of protecting the forest trees oaks from the spread of dangerous P. ramorum fungus. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter - argues that viewpoint trying to prove these three methods do not seem convincing.First and foremost 80
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant For instance humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37 C no matter whether the environment is warm or cold Because dinosaurs were rep 92
- Build a new research business center vs agriculture center 60
- Should people learn the foreign language by going to the country that speaks the language? 60
- The author states about the reasons that show that the teenage girl in the portrait did belong to Jane Austen. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.First and foremos 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...as electric batteries in ancient times. as opposed to, the lecturer who counter-ar...
^^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... and foremost, the writer mentions that werent any evidence that these vessels were us...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 316, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...ese vessels were found by villagers who werent train to do that. These local people mi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...ere found by villagers who werent train to do that. These local people might have not...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nt muscles problems and as magic power. .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, lastly, look, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25423728814 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51512188487 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2579839958 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3846153846 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445904419535 0.272083759551 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153089679313 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189332393622 0.0662205650399 286% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326939471616 0.162205337803 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.355690753167 0.0443174109184 803% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.