Both the reading and the lecture discuss the decline of literature and its consequences. While the reading mentions only shortcomings of this phenomenon, the lecturer looks on the bright side.
Both the reading and the lecture discuss the decline of literature and its consequences. While the reading mentions only shortcomings of this phenomenon, the lecturer looks on the bright side.
First, reading indicates that people who read books can not get rich intellectually. Because something else does not provide the same momentum as literature, we release the opportunity to benefit from reading. Novertheless, the professor at the lecture refutes the arguments, questions the explanation given in the article, because not every book stimulates our brain, but only scientific, historical or other high-quality literature.
Further, according to the opinion, reading literature is replaced by other media, which spoil the readers mind and which have lower quality, this leads to a decrease in the literary and cultural level of the population. On the other hand, the lecturer believes this is not true and other media such as music, art or movies affect positively our culture and, furthermore, may speak more directly with the audience than the literature.
Last but not least, reading suggests that, despite the abundance of good books, the industry lacks investment for shrinking audiences. The lecturer, however, sees another reason for this problem, It mentions that modern books are often too difficult to understand, so the reader can buy them.
To sum it, the reading provides three arguments illustrating disadvantages of the literature’s decline, but the professor in the lecture does not agree with them and says why they are not plausible.
- The reading advocates prohibiting the sale of fossils but the professor is certain that the negative effect of such practice is greatly exaggerated 80
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 78
- It is important to keep old friends than to make new 60
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
- The table provides data on how people in five countries spent their money in the year of 2002 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43621399177 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9344536064 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654320987654 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8056815125 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.1 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424667719061 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189266111837 0.0996497079465 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.227951903082 0.0662205650399 344% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276574009829 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.321893643331 0.0443174109184 726% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.