a buzzer
The reading and listening materials have a conflict of opinions about buzzers. In the reading, the author explains that these people who work as buzzers face a lot of critics. On the other hand, the speaker who works in the phone service as a buzzer disagrees with these opinions.
First of all, the writer describes that the buzzers do not say the truth about products and they give wrong information about them. By contrast, the lecturer in the listening passage refers to this fact, they use the product and if they satisfy of products, they will advertise them. Also, they earn money in this way, but they tell the truth to people and do not make problems for people to buy a bad product.
Second, the author discusses that these people pretend are a usual person so that people listen to their advice and believe their claims. On the contrary, the speaker makes it clear that people ask a lot of questions and do not accept their claims easily. Therefore, if they do not satisfy with their buzzer’s advice, they will not buy and spend money for this product.
As a final point, according to the writer, it is believed that buzzers make a very bad impact on other people so that it makes problem in the society. Thus, people cannot truth to each other and it makes them skeptical. In contrast, the speaker in the lecture holds an opposite view. He explains that they say useful information and help people to buy a good product so that they have the positive impact on the society and spread a great feeling among people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-03 | fireflower | 73 | view |
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 60
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
- One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 66
- The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character 86
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions presented the reading passage. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64835164835 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29641993683 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490842490842 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6393235804 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6153846154 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15636129847 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719050825917 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920531101896 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118784577765 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666681474684 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.