cane frogs problem in autralia
The article and the lecture are both about the infestation of the cane toad in Australia. The author presents three possible ways to eliminate the rapidly growing population of cane toads in Australia. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that they are inaccurate.
According to the reading, the spread of cane toads into central Australia can be prevented by constructing a national fence along the border. The article mentions that this method was previously used for preventing rabbits from entering central Australia. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that young tadpoles and eggs which stay in the water may possibly enter in some way through the river streams. Additionally, she points out that a few tadpoles and eggs, which reach central Australia through river streams are enough to reproduce and increase their numbers very rapidly.
Secondly, the author suggests conducting a countrywide campaign involving the citizens to catch and destroy the cane frogs. The lecturer, however, asserts that there is a high possibility of untrained volunteers unknowingly killing the frogs that belong to Australia’s ecosystem. She goes on to say that, while the cane frogs are in the tadpole stage, they are very similar to the native species, so identifying them is not possible for the untrained volunteers. Therefore, there is a high chance that the native species might be affected by this measure.
Finally, the author posits that introducing a virus, made especially for cane frogs, that can prevent them from maturing and reproducing is a viable option. In contrast, the lecturer’s stance is this may affect the population of frogs in the south and central America. The cane frogs are native species there. She notes that frogs are transported either for research purposes or as pets. When a virus-infected cane frog goes from Australia to America, then there is a high probability of the virus infecting the cane frogs in America, which are native species there.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 60
- At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Do you agree or not with the statement 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 73
- Children should be prohibited from playing video games 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... population of cane toads in Australia. The lecturer disputes the claims made in th...
^^^
Line 2, column 365, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: may; possibly
...dpoles and eggs which stay in the water may possibly enter in some way through the river str...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 365, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'may'.
Suggestion: may
...dpoles and eggs which stay in the water may possibly enter in some way through the river str...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21406727829 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76071426755 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529051987768 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3743490188 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7222222222 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209584323424 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716587347136 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790324944087 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131803017709 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865033715143 0.0443174109184 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.