The cane toad is a (1.8kg) large amphibian native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia with the expectation that it would protect the framer crops by eating harmful insects instead their their rapid population growth is dangerous from other animals.
Both the passage and the lecture discuss about the rapid increase of population cane toads in Australia. While the passage says that there are few ways to eliminate the cane toads which can cause the other native animals species harm the lecture disagrees as it won't be easy to do so.
First, the passage claims that the cane toad can be blocked or can be stopped by building a national fence. Which will stop them from moving in other parts of Australia. However, the lecture insist that it will be unsuccessful and will have unwanted damage as there are rivers and stream near by. And the young cane toad and their eggs can flow through the water ways to the other side. Also the need very few count to establish their population again.
Next, the passage asserts that collectively capturing and eliminating the toads with the help of volunteers will work. In contrast, the passage argues that it could have worked it they were careful and skilled. But the untrained volunteers might destroy the native species of frog or the endangered species of frogs as they cannot be differentiate when they are young toads.
Finally, the passage states that they can control the population by giving then a special disease causing virus. On the other hand the lecture points out that it could cause terrible consiquences as it affect their original habitat. As the researchers export the reptile as other species to other country. And it will decrease the native cane toad population which is vital part of ecosystem. And whole ecosystem will suffer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-23 | Shrushti Krishna Vishwasrao | 80 | view |
- The cane toad is a 1 8kg large amphibian native to Central and South America It was deliberately introduced to Australia with the expectation that it would protect the framer crops by eating harmful insects instead their their rapid population growth is d 80
- Children should not be allowed to play computer games Do you agree or disagree 91
- Television advertising directed towards children from 1 year to 5 years should be banned Do you agree or disagree 70
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults want to live with their parents as long as they can 66
- Chevalier de Seingalt s long memoir of his life and adventures Summarize both the passage and the lecture points 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
... toads which can cause the other native animals species harm the lecture disagrees as i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e stopped by building a national fence. Which will stop them from moving in other par...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...d damage as there are rivers and stream near by. And the young cane toad and their eggs...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rough the water ways to the other side. Also the need very few count to establish th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun count seems to be countable; consider using: 'few counts'.
Suggestion: few counts
...s to the other side. Also the need very few count to establish their population again. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39738615985 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7818795967 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148378843267 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559849448076 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520420411293 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975570682488 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396334415455 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.