The cane toad is a large 1 8 kg amphibian species native to Central and South America It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers crops by eating harmful insects Unfortunately the toad multi

Both the reading and listening discuss the can toads, which are indigenous in Central and South America and introduced to Australia to protect crops from insects. The Author believes that there are three possible strategies to stop the proliferation of can toad. The lecturer challenges that claims made by the author. She is of the opinion that none of these strategies are successful and it might cause ecological damage.

To begin with, the author suggests that creating a national fence is an effective method to control the spread of can toad by stopping its movement to other parts. The Lecturer challenges this specific argument by asserting that the national fence will not stop their spread, since the young can toads and eggs are available in the river streams. Based on that, water can carry them from one side to another and they can establish there and grow. Thus, the national fence is ineffective way.

Secondly, the writer argues that the second strategy is that volunteers can easily catch and destroy the can toads especially, the young ones and eggs by hand and simple traps. The lecturer, however, rebuts this claim by explaining that the massive volunteers might catch the young endangered Australian frogs while they catch the can toads. Since, it is very hard to differentiate between young frogs and young can toads. As a result, it is very harmful.

Finally, the author posits that creating a virus that can cause illness to the can toads can effectively stop their spread. The lecturer, in contrast, casts doubt on this point by pointing out that this is a very bad idea and it has terrible consequences on the can toad population in America. In other words, the amphibian and reptiles species can be transported from Australia to other continents including America. This virus can infect the native can toads and have a devastating effect on them. Native can toads are a vital parts of the ecosystem and the whole ecosystem will suffer, if they get destroyed.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r believes that there are three possible strategies to stop the proliferation of ...
^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... volunteers can easily catch and destroy the can toads especially, the young ones...
^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Since, it is very hard to differentiate between young frogs and young can toads....
^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n contrast, casts doubt on this point by pointing out that this is a very bad ide...
^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that this is a very bad idea and it has terrible consequences on the can toad po...
^^
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other words, the amphibian and reptiles species can be transported from Australi...
^^
Line 7, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing effect on them. Native can toads are a vital parts of the ecosystem and the w...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in contrast, as a result, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 5.04856512141 436% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 335.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95820895522 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54510480654 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513432835821 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6272860697 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7058823529 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126472673791 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464156426829 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502942203574 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859603588941 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506834572594 0.0443174109184 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.