Chaveliar memoir
The article and the lecture are both about the authenticity of the Chaveliar memoir. The author of the reading believes that there is a significant amount of fictions in the memoir to increase its appeal to reader. The lecturer refutes the statements made by the author. He is of the opinion that the Chaveliar is relatively accurate and a reliable source for historians.
First, the author suggests that Chaveliar was not rich as described in the memoir because he is found to have borrowed money from a Swiss merchant. The argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that this evidence cannot prove that Chaveliar was poor. According to the professor, to continue gambling after spend a great amount of money, Chaveliar had to sell his property for cash. However, as conversion of assets into money might take a while, Chaveliar borrowed a sum when waiting for his money to arrive.
Second, the writer contends that there should be a huge difference between Chaveliar’s conversations with Voltaire as recorded in his book. The article notes that the written dialogue is only Chaveliar’s recollection after years, hence is not quite precise. The lecture, however, rebuts this point by asserting that Chaveliar wrote down everything he could remember every night after talking with Voltaire. As a result, the conversations published is not what recalled after years. This is evidenced by confirmation of a person living with Chaveliar that he usually consult his notes and journal during his writing of the memoir.
Finally, it is stated in the passage that Chaveliar’s getaway from prison in Venice is not through a hole in the ceiling as mentioned but thanks to his friends’ bribe to the jailers. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that other peers in the prison had even more powerful friends than Chaveliar did but none of them were likely to have escaped. He puts forth the idea that Venetian government had to repair prison’s ceiling after Chaveliar’s escape, suggesting that the causal effect relations between two events.
- o you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 90
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 90
- Did bees exist on Earth 200 million years ago 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...emoir to increase its appeal to reader. The lecturer refutes the statements made by...
^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: VB_A_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'take awhile'?
Suggestion: take awhile
...s conversion of assets into money might take a while, Chaveliar borrowed a sum when waiting ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, then, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 337.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17210682493 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91229624439 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554896142433 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5649920323 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.529411765 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381486166083 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122944603826 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982529759434 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244872239846 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737331509628 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.