the Chevalier de Seingalt's life
Both the author and the lecturer discuss authenticity of the chevalier’s memoir. The passage claims that memoir is not accurate and correct. The professor, on the other hand, completely rejects whatever mentioned in the reading through citing three reasons.
First, both the author and the lecturer talk about the chevalier's wealth. According to the passage, the chevalier borrowed money from a Swiss merchant, so he would have not been wealthy. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects author's view and illustrates the idea that spending money for party and gambling is indication of a great deal of capital but converting asset to cash took few days that time. Therefore, he was wealthy as he wrote in his memoir.
Secondly, both the reading and the professor discuss the chevalier and voltaire. The passage goes on to mention that the chevalier wrote details of his appointment with voltaire many years after, so he could not remember their conversations down to the smallest details. However, the professor refutes this, saying that he wrote down the daily events every night regularly but he mentioned his meeting with voltaire in his memoir many years after.
Eventually, both the passage and the lecture address the subject of the chevalier's escape from prison. The passage argues that he did not escape from the prison's ceiling, but he escaped from prison with assistance of his well-known friends who bribed jailers to free him. In contrast, the professor points out that many prisoner had powerful friends but they could not escape. In addition, jailers repaired ceiling after the chevalier's escape that shows his claim was reliable.
All in all, the author maintains that the chevalier's assertions are not authentic, while the professor not only cast doubt on, but she also demonstrates that he told the truth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | 200suranjan | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-19 | EdenWu | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-10 | Naveena0 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | anman | 80 | view |
- Because of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. A number of proposals in 3
- coal ashtpo 42 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. Using specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'chevaliers'' or 'chevalier's'?
Suggestion: chevaliers'; chevalier's
... author and the lecturer talk about the chevaliers wealth. According to the passage, the c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 155, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prisons'' or 'prison's'?
Suggestion: prisons'; prison's
... argues that he did not escape from the prisons ceiling, but he escaped from prison wit...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 316, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun prisoner seems to be countable; consider using: 'many prisoners'.
Suggestion: many prisoners
...contrast, the professor points out that many prisoner had powerful friends but they could not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26530612245 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65734870724 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0281551764 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0852021398447 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389477027899 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380308144698 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0519662262195 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00470926460621 0.0443174109184 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.