The article and the lecture both discuss whether the coins discovered by native american one thousand years ago are fake or real. The reading claims that it is possible that they are not genuine. The lecturer, however, refutes the author's assessment and contends that they are real. He demonstrate three reasons to cast doubt on the claims made in the reading.
The first allegation of the script against which the orator argues is the possibility that the coins do not belong to the Norse because they were discovered in far away place of the Norse settlements. The lecturer refuted this point by stating that those settlers did not stay in one place, but they moving from one place to another to collect other objects.
Secondly, according to the text since no other coins were found in the same place, these archaeological pieces do not belong to the Norse. Though the speaker finds this idea debatable, he bolsters his opinion by stating that The Norse packed all there things as they travel back to Europe. Moreover, it is most probable that they did not bring them with them as they travel back.
Finally, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that native Americans found these coin pieces as invaluable. He contends that even though the coins were not used by native Americans as money. However, they still considered them as a distinguished pieces to be used for beauty. According to the lecturer they may have used them as jewelry to look more appealing. Thus the Norse would be encouraged to carry them.
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern- 60
- In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, 80
- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725−1798) wrote a long memoir recounting hislife and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famouspeople, including kings and writers, his memoir has b 76
- Modern transportation and shipping has made the world a better place to live. 3
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... is possible that they are not genuine. The lecturer, however, refutes the authors ...
^^^
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ine. The lecturer, however, refutes the authors assessment and contends that they are r...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'demonstrates'.
Suggestion: demonstrates
...ent and contends that they are real. He demonstrate three reasons to cast doubt on the clai...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'piece'?
Suggestion: piece
...till considered them as a distinguished pieces to be used for beauty. According to the...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...them as jewelry to look more appealing. Thus the Norse would be encouraged to carry ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86641221374 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43900297354 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545801526718 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6227668146 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0714285714 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230244312872 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754229289675 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931149666026 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145352912406 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554500678465 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.