dianosur
The reading claims that one hundred million years ago, the dinosaurs survived harsh winter time in north Slop by migrating south and toward more habitable areas. However, the lecturer finds all the supporting facts in reading dubious, and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author argues that these dinosaurs feed on plants. Since during winter time, when north Slop is in total darkness, there was no food for them, they must have migrated to find food. Conversely the lecturer argues that although north Slop is in darkness during winter, during summer and warmer time sun shone at least for 12 hours a day. This prepared suitable condition for dense vegetarian growth. So, in winter time there were a lot of dead plants that animal could feed from and there were no needs to migrate.
Furthermore, the reading holds the view that according to the finding, these dinosaurs lived in herds, and many modern day animals which live in herds, migrate too .On the contrary, the professor highlights the fact that living in herd does not equal with migration. There could be other reasons for living in herds, for example more protection against predators. Nowadays there are some animals which live in herds, like elks in North America forests, which do not migrate. They have chosen this way of living for protection.
Finally, the reading asserts that these dinosaurs were physically capable of migrating long distance towards warmer climate. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due the fact that this is not the case for younger animals. She argues that adult dinosaurs were capable of moving in long distance, but young ones could not achieve this goal and would slow down the herd movement during migrations. Moreover herds could not leave them behind during migration. Hence, all the herds had to stay there.
- dianosur 86
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking web site. 86
- Nowadays people are more willing to help, they did not know for example, by giving clothes or food to people who need them than they were in the past. To what extend do you agree? 85
- Is it better to have a job where you work only three day a week for long hours that to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 76
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
..., they must have migrated to find food. Conversely the lecturer argues that although north...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...animals which live in herds, migrate too .On the contrary, the professor highlight...
^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...imals which live in herds, migrate too .On the contrary, the professor highlights ...
^^
Line 4, column 404, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...wn the herd movement during migrations. Moreover herds could not leave them behind durin...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'moreover', 'so', 'at least', 'for example', 'in contrast', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.262390670554 0.261695866417 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.148688046647 0.158904122519 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0787172011662 0.0723426182421 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0437317784257 0.0435111971325 101% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0174927113703 0.0277247811725 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.139941690962 0.128828473217 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0233236151603 0.0370669169778 63% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.24189675771 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0145772594752 0.0208969081088 70% => OK
Particles: 0.00291545189504 0.00154638098197 189% => OK
Determiners: 0.0962099125364 0.128158765124 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0174927113703 0.0158828679856 110% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0145772594752 0.0114777025283 127% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1842.0 1645.83664459 112% => OK
No of words: 306.0 271.125827815 113% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01960784314 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.356209150327 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.241830065359 0.287516216867 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.166666666667 0.187439937562 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0915032679739 0.113142543107 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24189675771 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584967320261 0.539623497131 108% => OK
Word variations: 63.9147020615 53.8517498576 119% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.125 21.7502111507 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2720544217 49.3711431718 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 132.220823453 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 21.7502111507 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8125 0.878197800319 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 43.3080065359 50.5018328374 86% => OK
Elegance: 2.02777777778 1.90840788429 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.08285743957 0.142949733639 58% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0667130785516 0.0787303798458 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.492510503318 0.631733273073 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.172409047104 0.139662658121 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.294994297193 0.414875509568 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0726363081166 0.0530846634433 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.