Driverless cars
Reading and writing are about the driverless cars called self-driving cars. More specifically, in regard to passages, the author is of opinion that self-driving cars are beneficial to society, and supports his position by providing three arguments. The lecturer is quick to point out that there are some serious flaws with each point. He is of the opinion that there are many disadvantages of driverless cars, and addresses, in detail the trouble with each point in the reading text.
To begin with, the author mentions that driverless cars will help to reduce the car accidents which normally happens due to human errors. He further adds that one of the technology company has completed an experiment in which this car has driven 700,000 miles without causing an accident. Nevertheless, this idea is contradicted by the speaker by pointing out that software used in these cars is designed by humans, so their code is prone to errors. Furthermore, he adds that the same car which traveled 700,000 miles without an accident had just hit a car last month and has created doubt among people.
Secondly, the author claims that driverless cars are beneficial for environment due to efficiency with which they drive. Next, he explains that due to traffic problems, we have to start and stop engines manually repeatedly. However, these cars can communicate with other automatic cars and can reduce traffic and start or stop engine less frequently. Yet, the author challenges this claim by revealing that if automatic cars, more people will start driving cars with any age restrictions. He elaborates it further by saying that this will result in increase of number of cars on roads, which will further add to existing traffic.
Finally, the author wraps up his argument by positing that these cars will give some time back to humans. Moreover, in the article, it is said that this time can be used on other activities like watching videos instead of focusing on roads. Not surprising, in contrast to author point, the lecturer contends that most people find driving cars as a welcome distraction from their daily routines as they use to hear music while driving. Additionally, he states that extra time given back by these cars which not be spent on any extra activities as people already watch videos during their normal routines.
To sum up, the author and the speaker have conflicting views regarding the driverless cars. It is clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-25 | Shubham Patel | 90 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | Shubham Patel | 76 | view |
- Driverless cars 80
- Use of buildings of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico 80
- Comics being an art form unique to America 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 403, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ction from their daily routines as they use to hear music while driving. Additional...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, in contrast to, in regard to, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 22.412803532 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 30.3222958057 198% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1373.03311258 153% => OK
No of words: 415.0 270.72406181 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04578313253 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.607191056 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 145.348785872 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515662650602 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 419.366225166 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.434270076 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.210526316 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73684210526 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365792616587 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124739071181 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106216600576 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206777451351 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874184922604 0.0443174109184 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.