Driverless Cars
The article introduces the topic of driverless cars which use software to drive without human intervention. The article suggests that there are many advantages to using driverless cars over a conventional car. The lecturer however disagrees to the points made in the article.
Firstly, the article mentions about the safety of driverless cars. The article states that driverless cars which use computer programs and a variety of sensors to drive will be more accurate and less prone to making mistakes that lead to accidents. The lecturer however contends to this claim by stating that the computer programs running the cars would have been designed by humans and would have some kind of error. The lecturer also talks about an article in the newspaper where the driverless car mentioned in the passage had hit another car the previous month.
Secondly, it is mentioned in the article that driverless cars would be more efficient because they would be able to communicate with other cars on when to start and stop which would lead to less fuel consumption. The lecturer disagrees to this claim. The lecturer states that cars that are autonomous would mean that the people using them would not require a drivers license. This would mean that even children would be allowed to use cars. This would lead to more number of cars on the road and hence more pollution.
Lastly, the author of the article mentions that humans would have more time to do work or watch videos with the car doing the driving autonomously. The lecturer however mentions that people don’t view driving as a bane. Some people find driving relaxing and they do it while listening to the radio or music. It has become a welcome distraction. Making cars autonomous would mean that people would now have extra time that they would spend on work or may even waste it.
As you can see, the author and the lecturer hold different views on driverless cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | KnockingOn | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | ishitakush.08 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-28 | rassata | 75 | view |
| 2022-10-28 | rassata | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | Shubham Patel | 90 | view |
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns w 50
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 59
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...riverless cars over a conventional car. The lecturer however disagrees to the point...
^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mans and would have some kind of error. The lecturer also talks about an article in...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91437308869 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42913574441 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45871559633 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4426605176 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2777777778 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356790048747 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134531522484 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138475376169 0.0662205650399 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244072191982 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134227198509 0.0443174109184 303% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.