The reading and the conversation both are about the uses of stone buildings. The writing proposes three suggestion regarding the uses of the building. The lecturer challenges this three provided theory by giving proper evidence.Furthermore the lecturer states that none of the theories are correct.
First of all, The author suggest that the building were intially used for residential purpose by the new mexican people. It is mentioned that they lookalike to apartment buildings. The person in the conversation rejects this claim by stating that the building cannot be residential place as it does not have enough fireplaces. Moreover it is mentioned that the fire places found in the archaeological site provides evidence that only around lived in the place. Therefore lecturer dismisses the suggestion of buildings used for residential area
Secondly, the arguments states that the buildings were used for storage purposes they further explain this theory by stating that the green maize prevalent at that time had to be stored somewhere and they say it was stored in large halls at that time.The lectures disagree this claims by providing evidence which puts forth point that the green maize evidence were never found in the particular region further elaborating thi s point they did not find any containers in that regions and hence refutes the claim.
Finally, the text gives a third proposal which mentions that the buildings were used for ceremonial purposes also gives examples saying they used it perform to ceremonial rituals and then threw the pots to trash.The lectures refutes the claim of using the hall for ceremonial purposes by stating that they also found many other artificates with the pots, They also found construction materials such as sand and pots and thus makes the proposal seem fallacious.
- The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint. 50
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species. 16
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends. 70
- Success in any realm of life comes more often from taking chances or risks than from careful and cautious planning." 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ion regarding the uses of the building. The lecturer challenges this three provided...
^^^
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ovided theory by giving proper evidence.Furthermore the lecturer states that none of the th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ovided theory by giving proper evidence.Furthermore the lecturer states that none of the th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... as it does not have enough fireplaces. Moreover it is mentioned that the fire places fo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ce that only around lived in the place. Therefore lecturer dismisses the suggestion of bu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of buildings used for residential area Secondly, the arguments states that the ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... was stored in large halls at that time.The lectures disagree this claims by provid...
^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'performs'?
Suggestion: performs
...also gives examples saying they used it perform to ceremonial rituals and then threw th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ituals and then threw the pots to trash.The lectures refutes the claim of using the...
^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'refute'.
Suggestion: refute
...en threw the pots to trash.The lectures refutes the claim of using the hall for ceremo...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... refutes the claim of using the hall for ceremonial purposes by stating that they...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thus, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2602739726 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73984588779 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530821917808 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 180.929083713 49.2860985944 367% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.666666667 110.228320801 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4444444444 21.698381199 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.2222222222 7.06452816374 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0797245357452 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359118701688 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310332128328 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0519846751865 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136871134292 0.0443174109184 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.3589403974 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.