elephants behavior
The passage presents some common beliefs regarding elephants and their behaviors. The lecturer disregards all the assumptions mentioned in the article, and she claims none of them are accurate. Her further demonstrations are as follows.
First, while elderly elephants do wander away from their herd, this behavior is not caused by their awareness of their approaching time of death. However, their breaking away from their herd is due to the fact that their teeth are worn down in old age, and they are not able chew very efficiently. Thus, they relocate to places near bodies of water where softer plants grow often.
Second, although elephants can indeed be trained to paint, their painting cannot be indicative of their understanging of art and the meaning of the pictures. If a trained elephant is observed while it is painting, it can be noted that the trainer is stroking the elephant's ear. The elephants' ears are very sensitive, and this characteristics can be employed to teach the elephant to paint. The elephant only understands that certain movements of a paintbrush result in a stroke of its ear, and it cannot comprehend the meaning of that movements and the final picture. It certainly does not regard this as art.
Third, whereas avoidance behavior in elephants when confronting mice has been reported, the speculation that this behavior is caused by fear of mice is not accurate. Elephants have displayed this avoidance behavior in areas that are not the usual habitat for mice, so the fright comes from the unfamiliarity of mice with elephants which is a very common behavior in animals. In contrast, when elephants have regular contact whith mice and are familiar with them, they do not exhibit this avoidance behavior and they simply do not mind the mice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-23 | nusybah | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | rodrian | 65 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | reza_fattahi | 83 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | HSNDEK | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | nikki07hung | 80 | view |
- TPO 29 agree or not to improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 90
- TPO 36 integrated cloud seeding is good and have been proved lab experiments support this approach countries observed its effectiveness local studies have accepted its value 80
- When Namibia gained independence in 1990 teenager Pascolena Florry was herding goats in the country s dry desolate northern savannah Her job unpaid and dangerous was to protect her parents livestock from preying jackals and leopards She saw wildlife as th
- TPO 37 integrated TED is not a good device and approach for turtles the rate of their trap is not so much there are other more beneficial ways it cannot work for larger animals 80
- leadership naturally or acquied 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 264, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'elephants'' or 'elephant's'?
Suggestion: elephants'; elephant's
... noted that the trainer is stroking the elephants ear. The elephants ears are very sensit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 322, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... elephants ears are very sensitive, and this characteristics can be employed to teac...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, so, third, thus, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05762711864 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71153811596 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532203389831 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8300363401 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401746980482 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138911373972 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130399309475 0.0662205650399 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204367753098 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125635022013 0.0443174109184 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.